Provolution: No this trial is a matter of principle; "Constitution or no Constitution ?".
EMP's point is clear; "Constitution". That is not sad, that is Democracy. I think EMP should gain a lot of our respect because of it.
That said; I think pointing to the turnplayer (me) as the accused is a bit unjust. Like I said earlier; the only decision I took was to choose the moment of play. Just imagine what would have happened if -because of the poll needing the proper amount of time- war would not have been declared ? Would that be against the "will of the people" ? I think it is. OK, Declaring war before the poll ended is illegal, but so is Not declaring war before the poll ended.
So we have a situation here in which both declaring war and not declaring war is illegal. This should be a signal that "declaring war" is not the issue here and I (and others) should not be accused of this. The issue is "playing too early". Is this a crime according to our laws ? I don't know, but I do know that "Not playing too early" is nearly considered a crime in the ISDG (or at least frowned upon).
That means our Constitution is in conflict with the ISDG-rules. The ISDG-rules are higher in rank than our Constitution, thus I see this legal debate as the prelude to a different legal debate and work on: "Getting our constitution legal".
It cannot be good that doing something is always a CFC-crime while at the same time not an ISDG-crime and doing nothing is never a CFC-crime, but always an ISDG-crime.
EMP's point is clear; "Constitution". That is not sad, that is Democracy. I think EMP should gain a lot of our respect because of it.
That said; I think pointing to the turnplayer (me) as the accused is a bit unjust. Like I said earlier; the only decision I took was to choose the moment of play. Just imagine what would have happened if -because of the poll needing the proper amount of time- war would not have been declared ? Would that be against the "will of the people" ? I think it is. OK, Declaring war before the poll ended is illegal, but so is Not declaring war before the poll ended.
So we have a situation here in which both declaring war and not declaring war is illegal. This should be a signal that "declaring war" is not the issue here and I (and others) should not be accused of this. The issue is "playing too early". Is this a crime according to our laws ? I don't know, but I do know that "Not playing too early" is nearly considered a crime in the ISDG (or at least frowned upon).
That means our Constitution is in conflict with the ISDG-rules. The ISDG-rules are higher in rank than our Constitution, thus I see this legal debate as the prelude to a different legal debate and work on: "Getting our constitution legal".
It cannot be good that doing something is always a CFC-crime while at the same time not an ISDG-crime and doing nothing is never a CFC-crime, but always an ISDG-crime.