Let's move it guys!

[pholtz]

We got a Strategy forum now! Many of these new threads should be there? Keep the serious talk separate from the discussion of hotness?

 

[Sansa_Stark]

Many of us apparently didn't notice

So thanks for letting me (us) know.

 

[Disgustipated]

Hard for me to talk strategy when I haven't played the game.

 

[ehecatzin]

Every little piece of information that we can get our hands on has been speculated, disscused, disected, and speculated again, there's quite enough "serious" discussion on the forums. And also, why should it be separated from the rest of the threads? it's not speculation, or suggestions (its not like we have a funny section), a bit of mundane fun should be fine while we wait the final week to release. (tho I guess the cry of sexism was effective, only the hot female leaders is closed, go figure)

 

[Stilinski]

Every little piece of information that we can get our hands on has been speculated, disscused, disected, and speculated again, there's quite enough "serious" discussion on the forums. And also, why should it be separated from the rest of the threads? it's not speculation, or suggestions (its not like we have a funny section), a bit of mundane fun should be fine while we wait the final week to release. (tho I guess the cry of sexism was effective, only the hot female leaders is closed, go figure)

pretty sure it got closed because it was being derailed with talks of relationship names, not because cries of sexism

 

[Abraxis]

Two posts on a mild tangent is hardly a derailment, especially in a light-hearted fun polling thread. By that reasoning, this thread should qualify for closure by now as well.
Likely it was closed simply because the mod found it distasteful, as I couldn't find any rules that were actually broken after reading through the rules thread provided.

Anyways, I think this qualifies as "PDMA" and is against the rules.

 

[DeutschDachs]

Can't wait until all discussion is divided into subcategories so all activity is scattered and diluted!

 

[pholtz]

Didn't mean to start a discussion on a specific thread. I just hope that people that started threads that are strategic in nature will ask to be moved to the Strategy forum. I'll still come here occasionally but would like a forum I can peruse when I'm interested in strategy.

 

[Birdjaguar]

Didn't mean to start a discussion on a specific thread. I just hope that people that started threads that are strategic in nature will ask to be moved to the Strategy forum. I'll still come here occasionally but would like a forum I can peruse when I'm interested in strategy.

It is quite likely that within a few weeks, the Civ 6 forum will have as many subsections as the Civ 5 one does.