Everything works fine when everyone is making money. It's when there is no money is when it turns into a mess.
Fixed that for you.
Everything works fine when everyone is making money. It's when there is no money is when it turns into a mess.
That's a pretty big assumption on your part. Culture-wise Greeks and Italians were probably closer to Australians than Turks are to Germans, which kind of is the point of the other side's argumentation. Those who don't integrate well in Sweden - in what way weren't they supported? In what way does Australia support their immigrants more than Sweden?
It doesn't make your assumption any less of an assumption.Greeks, Turks, Italians, Maltese... they were all the same thing as far as Australia was concerned when they started migrating here.
I'm not impressed, it's nothing we don't have and due to our generous welfare system, our immigrants are likely given more economical support than your. I'm sorry, but your belief that all will fix itself by giving enough support isn't true. That said, most of our immigrants do integrate well.As for what's done differently? We welcome them as new Australians, respect their cultures, fund schools and education programs geared towards their language and cultures, and see them as full members of the community who will end up citizens who contribute to and enrich the cultural tapestry. We spend money on TV and radio stations geared towards different cultures (most prominently, the SBS). We have local governments and sometimes even State governments funding and promoting various festivals and cultural events. We don't assume newcomers are just economic resources and secretly hope they will all go home eventually, we don't insist newcomers they abandon their own culture and become exactly like anglo-celtic Australians. In a short, we don't see a contradiction between being Australian and having your own culture, and we set policy and expectations accordingly.
What attitude? Voicing that there are issues in integrating immigrants? Is it a subject that you'd like to remain taboo?Must be the attitudes of the locals then.
Why bring such a thing up in the first place then? -"All might have been perfect if you just had done like Australia 50 years ago"?! That's a great point to argue against...I like how you think it's making an argument to point out that a speculative guess about a hypothetical counterfactual is, OMG, "an assumption". You got me there, wow!
You're still making a lot of assumptions.Anyways, the problem in Europe must be the attitudes of the locals then, if the government is doing the right thing and the migrants are integrating.
I'm not impressed, it's nothing we don't have and due to our generous welfare system, our immigrants are likely given more economical support than your. I'm sorry, but your belief that all will fix itself by giving enough support isn't true. That said, most of our immigrants do integrate well.
Arwon said:Yeah but they have to be good at football or outspokenly support Liberal Party policy in order to be accepted into the community.
and this -I'm not impressed, it's nothing we don't have and due to our generous welfare system, our immigrants are likely given more economical support than your. I'm sorry, but your belief that all will fix itself by giving enough support isn't true. That said, most of our immigrants do integrate well.
aren't the same, nor can you conclude it's the fault of the locals from it. Not with reason at least.Anyways, the problem in Europe must be the attitudes of the locals then, if the government is doing the right thing and the migrants are integrating.
That's a pretty big assumption on your part. Culture-wise Greeks and Italians were probably closer to Australians than Turks are to Germans, which kind of is the point of the other side's argumentation. Those who don't integrate well in Sweden - in what way weren't they supported? In what way does Australia support their immigrants more than Sweden?
Would you like to clarify how you "let them get on with their lives"? Sweden is a pretty liberal country with extensive laws against discrimination. One of the problems might be that some continue/get on with their former lives in small communities, but getting taken care of by the state.I think it's less "who supports them better" and more "who lets them get on with their lives better"
Would you like to clarify how you "let them get on with their lives"? Sweden is a pretty liberal country with extensive laws against discrimination. One of the problems might be that some continue/get on with their former lives in small communities, but getting taken care of by the state.
sourcewikipedia said:In August 2001, under Captain Arne Rinnan, a diplomatic dispute brewed between Australia, Norway, and Indonesia after Tampa rescued 438 Afghans from a distressed fishing vessel in international waters. The Afghans wanted passage to nearby Christmas Island. The Australian government sought to prevent this by refusing Tampa entry into Australian waters, insisting on their disembarkment elsewhere, and deploying the SASR to board the ship. At the time of the incident, Tampa carried cargo worth A$20 million, and 27 crew.
The crew of Tampa received the Nansen Refugee Award for 2002 from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for their efforts to follow international principles of saving people in distress at sea.
Would you like to clarify how you "let them get on with their lives"? Sweden is a pretty liberal country with extensive laws against discrimination. One of the problems might be that some continue/get on with their former lives in small communities, but getting taken care of by the state.