Ok so here is some questions/statements that keeps getting repeated over and over. Hopefully we can put these to rest:
Why do ships have a higher strength than ranged strength even though they fight ranged only?
A ranged attack is checked against normal strength. By doing this they ensure the ships last longer in battles which I strongly support.
For example Imagine that a 50range vs 50strength would do 5dmg, now 35 vs 50 would do 2dmg hence the ship would need 5 hits before it dies.
Archers are range 2 but Riflemen are melee
The point here is range is relative. In the ancient age when people are attacking with swords and spears then a bow is considered ranged. However in the modern age, the same range would be considered melee.
archers with spearmen vs artillery with riflemen
Why do ships have a higher strength than ranged strength even though they fight ranged only?
A ranged attack is checked against normal strength. By doing this they ensure the ships last longer in battles which I strongly support.
For example Imagine that a 50range vs 50strength would do 5dmg, now 35 vs 50 would do 2dmg hence the ship would need 5 hits before it dies.
Archers are range 2 but Riflemen are melee
The point here is range is relative. In the ancient age when people are attacking with swords and spears then a bow is considered ranged. However in the modern age, the same range would be considered melee.
archers with spearmen vs artillery with riflemen