Craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap.
Why me!? Every time I'm rando killed I always have a power role.
Wait, I got it! DrumStudent killed me for trying to correct his definition of abstain and no lynch!
As for it being a convenient claim... well there's one doctor in the game. Me claiming it would be pretty stupid since it'd make me a confirmed mafia to that one player. Unless I really am telling the truth, which I am.
And about the disputing claim... what claim? Seriously, saying "he acted sketchy" is pretty much the exact same as "just because"
A) This is completely hypothetical. If you haven't noticed, nobody has yet appeared to contradict my claim, nor will theyWe can't afford to wait 'til tomorrow, because by that stage, almost half those remaining will be mafia, if we fail to lynch a mafia today. And I bet if we go with your suggestion of lynching both claimants to being doctor, you aren't going to volunteer to be lynched today, right (although to be fair, there's no situation I can conceive in which it would be a good idea for you to do that; mafia or innocent)? So, no, that idea is horrible.
I actually agree with arakhor that lynching somebody yesterday would have been better. What more do we have to go on? A bunch of abstain's aren't useful. The increased chance of success is a joke because Double A was in no practical danger yesterday either. And last I checked, the prospect of complete annihilation doesn't make the innocents suddenly better at making choices.And Arakhor's suggestion yesterday that 'yeah, we should risk lynching someone based on absolutely nothing, despite the overwhelming probability against success' does seem extremely fishy to me. Yesterday, we had no clue and a fool's hope of catching a mafia. Today we at least have some people's behaviour to go off, and an increased chance of success, plus the prospect of complete annihilation if we put off lynching again.