TheMeInTeam
If A implies B...
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 27,995
That's exactly it, every single AI in the game either liked me enough to not declare, or hated someone else more than me.
Using power to deter war is a huge fallacy ---> it only works on low difficulty levels. If you're even 1 soldier below the threshold that prevents a DoW, it's the exact same as if you had zero soldiers at all. In the BC-early AD years nobody who plays monarch+ is actually deterring war with their soldiers, that's completely rubbish
. Most AIs who are actually a threat to declare war at all will declare on you even if you're somewhat stronger...and some like monty will declare on you until you've got close to double his power. For the warmonger AIs on immortal, it is LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to use power to prevent war ahead of time early in the game, you HAVE to use diplo or just protect yourself when war does come.
Now, what soldiers CAN do is keep you alive once war comes. But, I was 99% sure that I wasn't going to be attacked, so why divert hammers? Or rather, if I spent hammers there rather than on tech in a peaceful game, I'd have fallen behind.
Using power to deter war is a huge fallacy ---> it only works on low difficulty levels. If you're even 1 soldier below the threshold that prevents a DoW, it's the exact same as if you had zero soldiers at all. In the BC-early AD years nobody who plays monarch+ is actually deterring war with their soldiers, that's completely rubbish

Now, what soldiers CAN do is keep you alive once war comes. But, I was 99% sure that I wasn't going to be attacked, so why divert hammers? Or rather, if I spent hammers there rather than on tech in a peaceful game, I'd have fallen behind.