Office of the Elder - 2400BC City Build Queue Plan Discussion

[Chieftess]

Build Queue: Warrior, Scout, Granary, Settler, warrior (maybe).

Beyond a granary, I'm kind of waiting on what we'll be researching.

For the next 2 city sizes, I would like it to have maximum growth (all 3 farms). Since the warrior will escort the settler, I'm also building another warrior. I'd also like a forest chop forested hill if it is to be mined) for the granary or next settler (unless we choose something like the Oracle, but I'd like to have the stone connected).

 

[fed1943]

May be better: warrior,settler,warrior,granary.
Current warrior leaves,next replaced it;settler for 3rd city,warrior leaves;next
one stays in city; plains/forest/river can be choped with no problems, granary
on time.
We know a bit of east and north,just west missing;not a hurry to 2nd scout.
With 3 cities: capital,powerhouse,commercial,wheat,cows,silver,gold,horses -
we shall have a solid start.
Best regards,

 

[730195]

(unless we choose something like the Oracle, but I'd like to have the stone connected).

Oracle likes marble, doesn't it?

 

[grant2004]

I'd agree with fed, I'd prefer to see the 2nd settler out sooner, we've got some good spots to settle and don't want those other civs beating us to them

 

[ordinaryguy]

I'd agree with fed, I'd prefer to see the 2nd settler out sooner, we've got some good spots to settle and don't want those other civs beating us to them

I third it. I've seen the save and the land out there is simply too good. It's worth it.

 

[Chieftess]

I'd agree with fed, I'd prefer to see the 2nd settler out sooner, we've got some good spots to settle and don't want those other civs beating us to them

Expanding too quickly leads to high maintainance costs..