Shaitan
der Besucher
No, there's a distinct difference. Acting Governors are never elected.Originally posted by donsig
Sounds an awful lot like deputy governors. That's borderline treason.![]()

No, there's a distinct difference. Acting Governors are never elected.Originally posted by donsig
Sounds an awful lot like deputy governors. That's borderline treason.![]()
Originally posted by Shaitan
No, there's a distinct difference. Acting Governors are never elected.![]()
Well... strictly speaking they do have to get past an acceptance poll... which probably makes them more elected than you or I, ShaitanOriginally posted by Shaitan
No, there's a distinct difference. Acting Governors are never elected.![]()
This is just a very long way to do multiple choice polling (which was shot down with laser guided missiles when I suggested it).Originally posted by disorganizer
an example:
you have 4 candidates. you like 2 of them and hate the other 2. you vote for one, but he doesnt get even up to deputy. your second choice becomes deputy though, so in the approval poll you decline the leader and accept the deputy. if many ppl think like this, the deputy would become the leader and could appoint a deputy for himself...
(now this is really! going to be complicated ;-)
Originally posted by Bill_in_PDX
Regarding acting governors, I think a single approval poll per position and individual is sufficient.