Hmm... you're right. It's been years sice I've played Civ2. Looking at Civ3 and thinking hard about the other two (Prince and King sound familiar), I've come to the conclusion that I'm wrong about what I said earlier. I know that there's the old Civ2 forums, but most of the news that I've seen recently has been about Civ3 (I'm mainly considering updates to game of the month and additions recorded on the front page, not updates on Conquest, or other material like that). You could use the same logic to say that this is a Civ1 site. If I remember right, those same difficulty level names were used for Civ1 also. So who's to say that Civ1's not at the heart of this site? The thing is that Civilization is at the heart of this site, not just one specific version of it. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but it seems to me that there are more Civ3 posters now, as it seems like they have more forums. I'm not trying to make this a debate about Civ2 and Civ3, and, if you'd like, you could change it. It's mainly about the rank thing.
No one else is considering the second part of my first post in this thread. I was curious mainly how a Sid rank would work out, as in a possibly higher quality avatar (or larger, but their limit's already good enough), exclusive forums, or whatever. I'm mainly trying to see if the civ fanatics here would like an extended title ranking system.
