snepp
King
Abacus said:Sorry snepp, you're exactly right.
I was reading 5:3/1.5 as (5:3)/1.5 and thought ":3" was a typo.
Both formulas are equivalent when the defender's bonus is 0, aren't they.
That's what I get for cramming things together and not spacing them out. As for the formulas, everything is straight forward and easy to see as long as the defender does not have a negative bonus applied, which is what inevitably causes all the confusion.