Charis
Realms Beyond
Wow! I didn't need a donut for breakfast, that report was enough sustenance.
I'm up next if I have the order correct:
Sirian
Charis
Carbon
Schnarrd
Some questions and comments for the loquacious...
Ponders.... yes, that's correct. (To soothe, I remind self that they would get parity almost instantly whenever they happened to contact other civs, which is a certainty once they get their first ship going down south. Unless of course the archer got them map making...)
I'm seeing now, in other games, that denying others is as important (or more) than choosing "prime" locations. (eg fending off hordes of indian settlers in rbd5), and sealing a border to a landlocked backward civ is "up there" in priority. As I recall, my fear was that the Romans would declare war if I told them to "get out" -- I plan to replay that turn and see
I was ready to let them walk 100 miles and meet other people if it meant we could play an expansion and building game instead of yet another early-despot-fight-your-neighbor game. *HAD* we gone to war with Rome, we would have won, and had all North, but India would have expanded almost up to Philly unchecked. Would be a very different game. Chicken? Perhaps ;p Thanks for pointing that out as the "source" of Rome catching up. Such hundred-year-later cause-and-effect post-analyses are very good. ("Ah!! That's why...")
I think your "Wonder" plan will help us prevent having to write a "Oh, you do realize we lost Sistine because..." post many years from now. Would you please clarify the details behind this thinking:
I know about the "Cascade" and can see some, but maybe the coffee isn't kicking in yet. How do you know when/how a cascade will end? Here, why the need for the Great Wall?
Good explanation on the Currency-Mono-Theology maneuver!
Didn't know that... that explains alot, why for example a disproportionate number of jungle resources I mystically find UNDER foreign cities. Nice of them to locate that for us ;p Syracuse is ours one day, with certainty. Hmm... I wonder if New Bombay is future home to resource too.
Woo, no doubt! I expected that site to be unattainable or very tricky to get. I'll have to replay first few years to see. I had a taste of this in rbd5, where I maneuvered India off Marseilles's future home, and was just thrilled to see their ship finally "turn south." Same principles but Baltimore looks even harder.
> Denver has some overlap, but that's the best I could do.
Definitely a needed city in that spot. Did I mention how nice of a "hub" our FP site is now?!
> Not really sorry I ended when I did, I definitely would have flubbed up Baltimore and Pittsburgh.
Another excellent "Sleepy Gambit" ??
I'll play the game this eve... looking forward to it.
Charis
PS Hopefully I'll be
not 


I'm up next if I have the order correct:
Sirian
Charis
Carbon
Schnarrd
Some questions and comments for the loquacious...
The first came when the Roman archer slipped past us, when Charis opted to found at Atlanta instead of Buffalo. That archer is why the Romans got to tech parity.

I'm seeing now, in other games, that denying others is as important (or more) than choosing "prime" locations. (eg fending off hordes of indian settlers in rbd5), and sealing a border to a landlocked backward civ is "up there" in priority. As I recall, my fear was that the Romans would declare war if I told them to "get out" -- I plan to replay that turn and see

I think your "Wonder" plan will help us prevent having to write a "Oh, you do realize we lost Sistine because..." post many years from now. Would you please clarify the details behind this thinking:
On the inherited turn, I established our last embassy, with the Greeks, and saw that they were just starting on the Great Wall. With just Currency to go until the Middle Ages, I realized that we had better build the Great Wall ourselves, or else the cascade is going to cost us Sistine Chapel. ... ... The Lighthouse is going to be built by the French. No one else is even attempting it. It's good that the French are building it in a strong city, and not some colony which would allow endless cascade effect to linger for 1000 years, and every civ on the map to start on it and drag it on and on. Halting the cascade was the other reason I suggested Atlanta when I did.

Good explanation on the Currency-Mono-Theology maneuver!

I'll bet a dollar to a donut that there's either rubber or coal over there, as they passed plenty of good jungle before landing where they did. The AI is KNOWN to beeline right to future sites of resources. (Ain't that just too convenient? Heh).
Didn't know that... that explains alot, why for example a disproportionate number of jungle resources I mystically find UNDER foreign cities. Nice of them to locate that for us ;p Syracuse is ours one day, with certainty. Hmm... I wonder if New Bombay is future home to resource too.
Baltimore founded! Yes! VICTORY! This has to be one of my greatest Civ3 accomplishments ever. (I kid you not). I felt like I'd been put through a torturous eye-popping brain-fuzing chess problem.
Woo, no doubt! I expected that site to be unattainable or very tricky to get. I'll have to replay first few years to see. I had a taste of this in rbd5, where I maneuvered India off Marseilles's future home, and was just thrilled to see their ship finally "turn south." Same principles but Baltimore looks even harder.

> Denver has some overlap, but that's the best I could do.
Definitely a needed city in that spot. Did I mention how nice of a "hub" our FP site is now?!

> Not really sorry I ended when I did, I definitely would have flubbed up Baltimore and Pittsburgh.
Another excellent "Sleepy Gambit" ??
I'll play the game this eve... looking forward to it.
Charis
PS Hopefully I'll be

