Timsup2nothin
Deity
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2013
- Messages
- 46,737
In my opinion the whole 'atrocities' thing is nonsense.
Some go to war and admit that atrocities are just part of the deal.
Others go to war saying only the enemy commits atrocities and then commit them out of hand anyway.
Still others go to war and don't commit atrocities unless they start looking like they are going to lose, at which point they are 'forced' to 'do whatever it takes'.
And that covers everyone who goes to war. If you get through a war without committing atrocities you so outmatched your opposition that you never had any doubts about winning, and that isn't really any sort of moral high ground.
Bottom line, if you don't want to commit atrocities then war is not for you.
Some go to war and admit that atrocities are just part of the deal.
Others go to war saying only the enemy commits atrocities and then commit them out of hand anyway.
Still others go to war and don't commit atrocities unless they start looking like they are going to lose, at which point they are 'forced' to 'do whatever it takes'.
And that covers everyone who goes to war. If you get through a war without committing atrocities you so outmatched your opposition that you never had any doubts about winning, and that isn't really any sort of moral high ground.
Bottom line, if you don't want to commit atrocities then war is not for you.