oxonian2001 said:There's also a school of thought that says monotheistic religions, by sharply dividing the world into "natural" realms (which operate according to predictable laws) and "supernatural" realms (which are the province of the deity, but circumscribed in scope), actually helped create the conceptual underpinnings necessary for scientific research to take place at all.
Hm, I`ve never heard of this myself either, and it is indeed interesting. But I`d still point out that simply going for a naturalistic explanation, or even world-view if you like, in the first place is just as effective, or perhaps even more effective since this sharp division may not actually always be that sharp (excluding that we only observe one side and have no clue of the other if we presume this). The argument also fails to explain excactly why monotheistic religions should have a sharper division of natural and supernatural. The only thing I could think of is that since polytheism has more gods, you need more ways of discerning and characterizing each one, and thus it is often "necessary" to make them interact with the world. But it certainly doesn`t exclude polytheism from in principle to have an equaly sharp division of natural and supernatural as monotheism might have.