Kidinnu
Chieftain
Warlord Sam,
The problem with that is that Civ4 doesn't support transport of food. So yes, whoever held the east could trade away the health benefit, but cities in other regions couldn't get the raw food, which is more how it worked. Instead, whoever held the east would have a few huge (but probably low-production) cities, with way more food than they could provide happiness for.
The problem with that is that Civ4 doesn't support transport of food. So yes, whoever held the east could trade away the health benefit, but cities in other regions couldn't get the raw food, which is more how it worked. Instead, whoever held the east would have a few huge (but probably low-production) cities, with way more food than they could provide happiness for.