Sentencing Poll: Chieftess (II)

[Octavian X]

This is a poll to sentence Chieftess, who has official been declared guilty by the citizenry of Fanatika of violating CoL.D.1.E.

The Trial Poll may be found here.

Discussion may be found here.

 

[Immortal]

just for clarification, are people allowd to post what they voted for in this thread?

 

[Octavian X]

There is nothing in our laws against that. That is something the moderators may enforce if they wish to or not. i would recommend against that, though.

 

[Cyc]

Oh, good. Then I voted for a Warning.

 

[Veera Anlai]

I believe that due to the unclear wording of the laws and that the judiciary was actually required to come in and interpret them, a 'No Warning' is in order. At the time, Chieftess had no idea what she was doing was wrong, and it wasn't her fault that the laws weren't clearly worded.

 

[Immortal]

I say warning as well.

 

[disorganizer]

hehe. i just wonder about the sense of finding someone guilty and not punishing it the punishement should propably have warning as minimum ;-)

 

[TheDuckOfFlanders]

I say no sentence.And damned i'm getting sick of this sort of situation's.May i tell you all that i damn well know what a enormous responsebilety it is to be a president and how easy it is to overlook some details.Keep this in mind in this ruling.
PI's and legal issue's are one thing ,they can add something to the game ,and are part of the democracy ,but they don't have to go that far.This is stil a game ,so keep it fun please.