I wrote my post in haste, so I apologize if I seemed to be blaming you for skipping ahead to 2.3 and not saying so; that was not at all my intent.
When I added Sevopedia to BUG, I
thought I was adding 2.2a -- the most recent version that I could find. I don't remember now if I pulled it from Ruff's mod (probably) or was pointed to it by someone else. It's been too long. So it was all just a misunderstanding, and I somehow got 2.3 (given how it looks and that you're name is in the code) but thought I was using 2.2a, so I probably looked at 2.2a's readme for my information. Who reads comments?
In any case, I will definitely add you to the BUG credits and the help file (bummed that we just did a release yesterday
and found this out today). I also would
not want to start back with 2.2 nor any earlier version, nor was I proposing that. I would, however, like to add some of the 2.2 goodness to BUG.
If you take a look at the BUG code, you will see that I too have rewritten a lot of the selection/linking code. I did this when I added in fitchn's Index. It started as an easy way to switch it from a TOC entry to its own button on the bottom of the page and ended up being waaaaay more work than I anticipated.
Live and learn, but at least I know a lot more about how Sevopedia works.
I'd love for you to add features to BUG's Sevopedia if you'd like. Be forewarned, however, as I said it is different. It should certainly be possible to extract BUG's Sevopedia (with the index and other stuff like shortcuts, BTS concepts, hints, and strategy articles) if you would prefer to work on an independent Sevopedia useful outside of BUG. If that's the case, I can fill you in on more details of our version.
The other option of course is to work from your 2.3 version and ignore BUG. In that case, I may take in some of your additions, and I may not. It all depends on which will be easier: extracting your changes from a 2.4 of yours or adding the features directly to BUG's version. I'm cool with however you want to proceed, even doing nothing of course.
In the meantime, I'll pull down your 2.3.2 version to get some more background for myself on the history.