"After Mass Media"
BLubmuz said:
With the fort you indicatd the galley in Trebizond can move in our territory and be upgraded?
Dhoomstriker said:
Still, we'd probably only spend Gold on upgrading units after we've learned Mass Media.
Let me understand: i thought we was in a rush to finish the game ASAP and you're speaking to do something after MM?
if everything goes in the right way, we have 6 turns until victory, 7 counting the turn we need to have the UN built for Mehmed. At that point, "le jeux sont fait" no time to move units, no time for almost anything. All our missionaries must be in place, if not all our cities are Buddhist.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but you suggested that we upgrade a Galley that is located near the 2 western Barb Cities.
One of my suggestions was to form a chain of Galleons between Zara's area and the western Barb Cities' area.
We need somewhere around 4 to 6 Galleons to build a complete chain.
Since we have to have our Great People on the Fur when we win, we can effectively obtain a Great Person AFTER we learn Mass Media and still have time to get that Great Person to the Fur.
The more Galleons that we have in our chain, the more chance that we'll be able to have of moving that last Great Person not only safely but quickly to the Fur.
My assumption when I spoke about spending Gold to upgrade a Galley was that you wanted to use this Galley as part of our Galleon chain.
My suggestion to spend money after Mass Media was because after Mass Media is learned, we no longer need Gold for deficit research, so we potentially have more Gold to play with than before we learn Mass Media.
I suspect that the upgrading of a unit within a Fort suggestion will not work. It's not that the idea is not a good one--it is a great idea, especially since Forts act like Cities in many ways and you would think that basing a unit in a Fort within your own territory would be a logical place to upgrade a unit. However, I doubt that the programmers and/or designers thought to code in this scenario.
But, if it does work, I am simply suggesting that we wait until after we learn Mass Media to spend this Gold on upgrading a Galley to a Galleon, as we will still have time to make use of such an upgraded unit, as it will be one-turn-of-movement away from where it needs to be by the very nature of the fact that it can make up the "last unit" in our Galleon chain that stretches from Zara's lands to the Barb Area's Fort.
Does that make sense to you?
Secretary General
Once, in one of my solo games, i conquered the AP city 1-2 turns after the APResident elections. The APResident was still the same, with less votes (obviously) but the same.
The same can apply to the UN.
Are you basing your claims of similarity between the Apostolic Palace and The UN in this regard based on evidence or based on an assumption due to the fact that the two victory types are similar? I'd rather base our decisions on fact if it's only a matter of putting together a test to find out the answer.
So, it would be nice to know for certain who would be the Secretary General under these circumstances.
Further, your point doesn't answer the other aspect of the question, which is:
If Toku gets elected Secretary General, if we have the largest population, and if Zara controls The UN, who would be the two candidates in a Diplo Vote?
The UN in Mehmed's Lands
IMO, we have 2 options:
a) build the UN in Riverdale, try to win the SG Election against Toku and before the vote arrives give the city to Zara.
b) hope that Mehmed will siege his former city, build the UN there and evacuate it the turn it completes. Game over. Victory assured.
The problem is that we can't move the GEs quickly from Ottomans land to Riverdale in case we see Mehmed do not make any effort to take it back.
If we move our Great Engineers to Mehmed, we're committing to building The UN there.
The hope of not having to face Toku in a Secretary General election is not the only reason for letting Mehmed be the one to control The UN.
Let's say that it takes Mehmed 5 turns to capture The UN. We will still be better off Diplomatically with Mehmed owning The UN than Zara having The UN, as we will have the chance of counting Zara's vote for us. With Zara controling The UN, we will for certain have neither Zara nor Mehmed voting for us.
Just because we cannot get Mehmed to capture The UN immediately upon it being completed does not mean that building The UN in Mehmed's lands is a failure--far from it. Instead, it just may make it harder for us if Toku gets elected as Secretary General.
We really should know ahead of time what the implications of Toku becoming the Secretary General are. We should know, because if Toku becomes the Secretary General, then we will need to know if we should maintain control of The UN and do our best from that standpoint--if giving up The UN will give us a 0% chance of being elected, then obviously, giving up The UN under those conditions would be a mistake.
I don't understand the reasoning behind trying to short-change our testing. If we're going to do some testing, let's not be lazy about it, let's do it right, and let's get the facts. Then we can go forward with informed decisions.
If you don't want to go to the effort, fine, don't do it. Someone else can do it, and if no one volunteers, I'll end up doing it when I have the time. The only dangerous thing that can happen is to make assumptions, treat them as fact, and then convince the team not to do the testing because they believe that it has already been done when the reality is that it has not been fully accomplished.
Diplo Situation
For the SG election this is the
Code:
Diplo situation:
Thank you for that table. However, that table fails to capture some additional info which I believe really matters for us to be able to make informed decisions about those numbers. That info is:
1. Who is Friendly with whom
AND
2. If an AI is Friendly with Toku, how much above "just barely Friendly" with Toku are they?
AND
3. If an AI is Friendly with us, how much above "just barely Friendly" with us are they?
That info combined with your table will give us a map of who will vote for whom in a Secretary General vote. It will also give us a map of who will vote for whom if we face only Toku in a Diplo Victory vote (it doesn't list the Attitudes towards other AIs, so we can't say anything about them). However, before you go typing out all of the same numbers for every AI, you can go back to my uploaded screenshots and see a colour-coded screenshot of the F4 -> GLANCE screen that gives the same numbers but also addresses missing info #1 from above.
What is not revealed is missing info #2 and missing info #3, as that info comes from information that is not displayed in the game's interface and must be tracked separately.
Also, it should be made clear that if someone votes for us to be Secretary General, there is no direct correlation with that fact and whether or not they will vote for us to be Leader of the World in a Diplo Victory vote. Instead, you have to refer to the three itemized points above to determine who will vote for whom and who will abstain.
Justinian can be +13 and Friendly with us and he can still do either of:
a) Vote for Toku to win a Diplo Victory
OR
b) Abstain in a Diplo Victory vote
Further, the analysis can't just be limited to Toku. If we want to consider making someone else our opponent, we'll need to look at all of the numbers together, to see which AIs would be more likely to vote for us than a potential UN Opponent, and weight those options against each other, even against the option of selecting Toku as our opponent. In isolation, the numbers won't tell us nearly as much info as they can when used in the context of the info of Attitudes towards our other potential UN Opponents.
Your numbers make me believe that you are not aware of the inner-workings of how a Diplo Vote is calculated. I admit that I am not 100% certain of them, myself. I have heard that you need to be at "+7," that you need to be at "+8," that you need to be "Friendly," and all sorts of other rumours.
However, my current understanding is that:
1. In order for us to vote for us in an election, an AI must be at a certain minimum attitude level or else they will not consider voting for us.
AND
2. This threshold of this minimum attitude level is higher for a Diplo Victory vote than for a Secretary General vote.
AND
3. If an AI treats us and our UN Opponent equally in terms of attitude level, they will abstain in the vote.
Those above points are non-specific enough of statements for me to feel confident in their correctness.
The following is speculation:
4. I BELIEVE that we an AI must treat us as Friendly or just below Friendly in order to get their vote for a Diplo Victory.
AND
5. I BELIEVE that we an AI must treat us as Pleased or just below Pleased in order to get their vote for a Diplo Victory.
AND
6. I BELIEVE that "relative" values matter in terms of point 3, such that if Justinian looks at us and says "Friendly" and looks at Toku and says "Friendly," then he will look to the AMOUNT of points above the "smallest value required to be Friendly" with each of us and then use those amounts as a comparison point. We would have to have an amount that is greater than Toku's amount if we wanted Justinian's vote.
AND
7. I BELIEVE that if an AI is Friendly with us but is not Friendly with our UN Opponent, we will automatically get that AI's vote in a Diplo Victory vote.
Buddhist Isabella
If we manage to convert Izzy ASAP, she will raise quickly
Note quite. Her attitude with us would go up at the same rate as any other AI's attitude of an AI that shares our Religion and has not yet reached the maximum amount of "liking us" for sharing the same Religion.
This rate is constant across AIs and it is a rate of +1 per 10 turns. You will get a "free" +1 immediately. You will also get a "free" +1 immediately if the Religion's Holy City is controlled by the AI who is judging you.
What is DIFFERENT about Isabella is that, over time, she will like someone for having a longer period of Shared Religion. However, we cannot take advantage of this fact (unless we keep losing the Diplo Victory vote), so she isn't much different from any other AI in this regard for our current situation of being limited to a short period of time in which to please her Religiously.