pnp_dredd
civ junkie
OK so here's the eventual post-PP, pre-sushi comparison between Moscow and Novogorad. It's not exact but pretty close.
Moscow size 13:
Total commerce: (37
)
2 golds (14
)
4 towns (20
)
3 riverside tiles (3
)
+2 specialists (6
)
Novogorad size 12:
Total commerce: (62
)
1 silver (5
)
9 towns (45
)
12 riverside tiles (12
)
Moscow as bureaucracy capital with academy/monastary/library/uni/oxford makes 37*1.5*(1+0.5+0.1+0.25+0.25+1)+6*(1+0.5+0.1+0.25+0.25+1)=190
Novogorad as bureaucracy capital with monastary/library/uni/oxford makes 62*1.5*(1+0.1+0.25+0.25+1)=241
(would be 290
with an Academy)
So Novogorad is >50
/turn better in the long run as a palace/oxford science city. But that's not the relevant question.
In order to equal Moscow's commerce, Novogorad needs to be working 4-5 towns (or the equivalent, e.g. 6-7 Villages).
Unfortunately, at the moment Novogorad is only size 3 and has only one hamlet and one cottage to work (shared with CI).
The fastest way to get Novogorad's cottages online will actually be to build a few farms to get that population growing, and then to switch to cottages once the population approaches 8-9.
It will take at least 20 turns to grow Novogorad up to around size 8-9, and that's if we focus on growth (which isn't optimal, because we need production for Forge/Palace/Uni/Oxford). Then another 30 turns to grow cottages into villages.
So I think that ~50 turns is the break-even point, where Novogorad will be producing as much commerce as Moscow. After that Novogorad will pull away quickly.
Is it worth it? Probably not, for two reasons:
1) Novogorad is so small that it will take too long to grow, build infrastructure and work cottages. We have 2 forests, but that's not enough. We can't whip because we need the population.
2) Worker turns are needed elsewhere.
It's a bit unfortunate that we haven't been focussing on Novogorad up till now: it could have had another couple of population and be working a few more cottages, if it had been focussed on growth and had a few more workers.
Moscow size 13:
Total commerce: (37

2 golds (14

4 towns (20

3 riverside tiles (3

+2 specialists (6

Novogorad size 12:
Total commerce: (62

1 silver (5

9 towns (45

12 riverside tiles (12

Moscow as bureaucracy capital with academy/monastary/library/uni/oxford makes 37*1.5*(1+0.5+0.1+0.25+0.25+1)+6*(1+0.5+0.1+0.25+0.25+1)=190

Novogorad as bureaucracy capital with monastary/library/uni/oxford makes 62*1.5*(1+0.1+0.25+0.25+1)=241


So Novogorad is >50

In order to equal Moscow's commerce, Novogorad needs to be working 4-5 towns (or the equivalent, e.g. 6-7 Villages).
Unfortunately, at the moment Novogorad is only size 3 and has only one hamlet and one cottage to work (shared with CI).
The fastest way to get Novogorad's cottages online will actually be to build a few farms to get that population growing, and then to switch to cottages once the population approaches 8-9.
It will take at least 20 turns to grow Novogorad up to around size 8-9, and that's if we focus on growth (which isn't optimal, because we need production for Forge/Palace/Uni/Oxford). Then another 30 turns to grow cottages into villages.
So I think that ~50 turns is the break-even point, where Novogorad will be producing as much commerce as Moscow. After that Novogorad will pull away quickly.
Is it worth it? Probably not, for two reasons:
1) Novogorad is so small that it will take too long to grow, build infrastructure and work cottages. We have 2 forests, but that's not enough. We can't whip because we need the population.
2) Worker turns are needed elsewhere.
It's a bit unfortunate that we haven't been focussing on Novogorad up till now: it could have had another couple of population and be working a few more cottages, if it had been focussed on growth and had a few more workers.