Originally posted by Ambiorix.
If you sponsor a civ like that, what makes you sure you won't become backwards yourself ? And does your statement above mean that you sometimes gave luxuries away for free or almost for free ??
I think that's one of the biggest differences between top players and average players : being in control of the game, rather than having it happen to you. So, how do you get to that point of control ?
It's hard to say really. It's funny because if I had played this game even 2 months ago I would have had a totally different outlook. But over the last two months I've been playing deity mostly and winning. So emperor is like a step back and I just know I can take control of the game right away and keep control. I know that doesn't help you out that much, but I can't really explain it any better. I guess it's just getting better at managing your build priorities, AI trades, science/luxury slider, etc.
And yes I gave away my luxuries. I had plenty of money throughout the game and having excess luxuries doesn't help me at all. I might as well give them away and see if the other civ's can make use of them and help me out. So basically whenever I had a spare luxury I gave it away to whoever I thought could make the best use of it.
]Originally posted by Ambiorix.
Isn't there an advantage in granting everyone free techs ? If you bring them to the same tech-level as yourself, your tech becomes cheaper, no ? And you're researching faster anyhow, so there's little risk involved.
No, my techs don't get cheaper by gifting techs around. I'm always researching undiscovered techs. That means I'm researching at monopoly price.
Yes I research faster than the AI, but as long as I'm gifting techs that gives the AI's up to date defensive units. With a fast tech pace strategy I'm constantly building infrastructure to maintain the fast tech pace and that results in being unable to produce as much military. If I leave civ's behind in tech though, I don't need a large military in order to conquer them. An example...if I wanted to do a late industrial age war. I have about 20 tanks. The AI has infantry and will get mech infantry soon though. I'd probably only be able to take 3-4 cities with my tanks before I run out. But if the AI was defending with riflemen, or even better musketmen, then I could easily steamroll their entire empire with just that stack of 20 tanks.
. The extra production during the golden age went toward completing factories, prebuilding hospitals, getting Sun Szu's Art of War (yes, it was still available in the industrial age), and building some Dragoons.


. The tech pace on the other continents had slowed because the Indians were fighting the Spanish, the Egyptians and the Chinese were involved in that war too. Rome had been fighting Carthage on and off. Everybody was gracious with me except for Carthage after I threw some gifts of money around, and I had done a lot of trading before. I figured Rome would be the opponent, and since they weren't allied with anyone, victory would be mine, right ? Right ? But Rome lacked coal, and though they were still second on the histograph and equal in culture, their cities were smaller than the others for want of the railroad boost. So instead of Rome, the opponent was Cleopatra - and she had the votes of her allies against Spain and Carthage who hated my guts. So I, erm, lost the vote 


Great accomplishment!![Party [party] [party]](/images/smilies/partytime.gif)