marioflag
History Addict
I don't know how much people use guerrilla and woodsman promotions in vanilla civ and warlords but they seem to me really weak if compared to combat or raider promotions.
Guerrilla can be useful in some cases like defending a city on the hill, but woodsman is just crap.Anyway i think that unless some specific situation arise you will ever choose combat or raider promotions instead of guerrilla.
So why not making these 2 promotions stronger?
For guerrilla perhaps you get a bonus in attack on the hill which is half of their defensive bonus so 20% attack on hill 40% defense on hill, or any bonus which seems to be balanced the same could be done for woodsman giving it the same bonus for attack in the forests/jungles, probably this promotion could be strenghtened a lot more considering that building a city on a forest/jungle tile just remove it, so situations were this promotion is useful are less frequent than guerrilla.
Guerrilla can be useful in some cases like defending a city on the hill, but woodsman is just crap.Anyway i think that unless some specific situation arise you will ever choose combat or raider promotions instead of guerrilla.
So why not making these 2 promotions stronger?
For guerrilla perhaps you get a bonus in attack on the hill which is half of their defensive bonus so 20% attack on hill 40% defense on hill, or any bonus which seems to be balanced the same could be done for woodsman giving it the same bonus for attack in the forests/jungles, probably this promotion could be strenghtened a lot more considering that building a city on a forest/jungle tile just remove it, so situations were this promotion is useful are less frequent than guerrilla.