Team vote on proposed amendment to rule 2.4

Should the amended 2 rule 2.4 be included in the ruleset?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Abstain

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .

donsig

Low level intermediary
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
12,905
Location
Rochester, NY
The proposed amendment follows. Please vote yes if you want this rule made a part of the rules, vote no if you like the current version of rule 2.4, or vote abstain if you don't care and are too busy playing with Iroqi goats. This poll will be open for seven days.

2.4 - Fair trades and peace treaties; unit transparency

Description: No team or individual is permitted to misrepresent what is offered in trades or peace treaties. No team or individual is permitted to misrepresent unit types.

Definition: Cities can be renamed to names of tech or sums of gold or anything else in an effort to not trade what that opponent agreed to. Units can be renamed to other units and appear to be something else entirely.

Purpose: To prevent the misleading of another team through malicious use of in-game features.

Verdict: Using the renaming 'feature' to name a city after a tech or sum of gold is a violation of this rule. Using the renaming 'feature' to name a unit after another type of unit is a violation of this rule.

Punishment Level: Once – Red (5-Expulsion and forfeiture of double what was not legally traded)
 
Back
Top Bottom