Term 3: Embassy to C3B

akots said:
So, I don't get it but seems like Joker is the president? They already had elections? Or only going to?

That other chat room is somewhat creepy but may be we can use it as well.

We can certainly go for currency.

He is president, they already did elections. Though it is funny how he was in the same spot as me in term 2, and now is president, but I am stuck in this dusty office/jail :p

He said some C3B citizens were having problems with IRC, as I even do to this day. Since it will not kill us I agreed to use it. After all, it is free and we don't have to download anything.
 
We had a chat with C3B after turn 72 and here is the border they suggested:
 

Attachments

  • IGD-1220BC-border.JPG
    IGD-1220BC-border.JPG
    80.6 KB · Views: 88
I asked a question in that chat, but haven't had an asnwer yet. I think it is important to know the answer before we agree on moving the border so far south.

"The last C3B-CFC chat I was in, C3B hadn't explored their lands so C3B was not sure how much land there is in their region. Has C3B more knowledge on the quantity of land now ? "

If they have a lot of and north; I don't want them to go further south than their current most southern city.
 
I'm still in favor of not having a border.
 
Rik Meleet said:
I asked a question in that chat, but haven't had an asnwer yet. I think it is important to know the answer before we agree on moving the border so far south.

"The last C3B-CFC chat I was in, C3B hadn't explored their lands so C3B was not sure how much land there is in their region. Has C3B more knowledge on the quantity of land now ? "

If they have a lot of and north; I don't want them to go further south than their current most southern city.

JokerDF (President-elect) said yes, though you might have missed it though that terrable chat room.
 
Where is the chat log, btw? There were a couple of important aspects discussed regarding CDZ and other civs and I did not like Joker's attitude. He just tried to avoid the subject and switched to some research agreement like the questions were not asked. I then got kicked out of that ridiculous chat may be even with some help. We should also submit the NAP treaty officially through UN ASAP.
 
akots said:
Where is the chat log, btw? There were a couple of important aspects discussed regarding CDZ and other civs and I did not like Joker's attitude. He just tried to avoid the subject and switched to some research agreement like the questions were not asked. I then got kicked out of that ridiculous chat may be even with some help. We should also submit the NAP treaty officially through UN ASAP.

#1 Joker I should was being ok

#2 I will ask Joker to send it ASAP.

#3 I told him that CFC will not meet in such a chat room, and he agreed, so we are back to the IRC channel.
 
The chat:

Welcome to C3B chat!
JokerDF: hi!
JokerDF: Sorry about that
EMP: hello
EMP: o no problem
JokerDF: ok, let's begin?
EMP: ok
JokerDF: You voted that thing about military alliance right?
JokerDF: the result was...?
EMP: one sec, akots is trying to get in
EMP: Akots says he is here, but I can not see him
JokerDF: i dont see him...
EMP: and he can only see me
JokerDF: Strange, ask him to exit and try again
EMP: that si what he is doing
EMP: I also notives I had to make a new sccount this morning
EMP: *noticed
EMP: *acount
JokerDF: me too, i will check this later
User akots entered this room
JokerDF: Hi akots
EMP: I see you akots
akots: OK, now it is working
akots: hi all
EMP: hello
akots: First question, how can I save the log?
EMP: we were just getting started
JokerDF: with ctrl+c, ctrl+v
JokerDF: So EMP, did you voted?
EMP: o umm
akots: Thanks, seems easy I can handle that
EMP: urcal agreement?
EMP: commercal?
User akots left this room
JokerDF: limitations of the commerce at war.
EMP: 11-yes no-3 Abstin-1
EMP: more then we need
EMP: and akots left
JokerDF: good, so we will add this article 5, military alliance right?
JokerDF: *AT article 5
EMP: well then what else is on the agenda
JokerDF: the borders
EMP: uh-ho
JokerDF: i'm check now if we may send maps, one sec
User akots entered this room
User akots left this room
JokerDF: they didnt send me an answer...
JokerDF: so we will have to use descriptions, no maps
JokerDF: EMP?
EMP: sorry, parental attack :p
JokerDF:
EMP: we coudl wait, and just start border talks whenever you get the info, sunday or not
JokerDF: i talked to same people that have friends at the UN, all they said that we cannot send this maps, so i think that we may the descriptions... I send an email to confirm directily, but the answer is probaly no
JokerDF: So we will have to get used to descriptions,
EMP: :p
EMP: I don't think CFC wants to talk borders anyways
JokerDF: ahn? last chat you said we would discuss that today
EMP: let me cheak
EMP: eh, that was an old poll, so let us jsut get some ideas
User akots entered this room
EMP: and proposals
EMP:
JokerDF: so... we will discuss it ?
akots: OK, this chat is somewhat glitchy
EMP: so what kind of border do we want
EMP: yes
akots: but for now I can see that you are talking
JokerDF: we were thinking at a simple border, no DMZ, just one line. That line could be changed from time to time as the exploration happend
JokerDF: what do you think?
akots: Am I still here?
JokerDF: yes... emp is mute
User Krasan entered this room
akots: hi Krasan
EMP: I am?
EMP: hello
JokerDF: lol
JokerDF: hi krasan
Krasan: Hi
JokerDF: About the border... is this the kind of border that you are thinking?
EMP: anything at this point
EMP: just as long as it is fair :p
JokerDF: Sure, And we would move it with time
EMP: if you want, I would profer not to though
JokerDF: It is possible for you to open a map of the region at Paint or something like that, so I can describe it and you Mark it at the map
EMP: EMPgive em 3 mients then
JokerDF: sure
EMP: got it
akots: Are you guys aware of the Lybian barbarian camp near your territory?
JokerDF: i would have to check that
akots: We would love to come there with our Javelin Thrower and kill them
akots: but it is 9 tiles to the north of the current location of out JT
JokerDF: 9 tiles north is our capital
akots: It is 4 tiles south and then 2 tiles SW from Rio-De-Janeiro
akots: There is a warrior guarding the camp and another one just left to the west
JokerDF: oh that one, we already send trops there
JokerDF: dont worry, our warriors can handle it
JokerDF: EMP, we made the line based on past DMZ discussions
akots: OK, but if you need help ever with barbarians, we would be happy to assist
akots: our slave farms are running dry atm
EMP: wait whatline
JokerDF: sure, thanks, but we dont need it right now, if we want some help, we will inform you
JokerDF: one i will talk about right now
akots: Just have to ask
JokerDF: *THE one
Krasan: a borderline
akots: I can open a map either
Krasan: ok
EMP: now where is this poposed porder
JokerDF: Do you see a Hill with tobaccos near it? a hill with costal-access
JokerDF: oh there is two hills with this descripton, the one with a tobaco at South other tobaco at East and other at Southeast
EMP: you mean west?
JokerDF: no... east
JokerDF: Let me try this way: a hill with a tocaco at right, and costal access at left
akots: OK, got that hill
JokerDF: ok, EMP got it?
EMP: well, we have not explored there, so I do not see the hill
akots: Lets set it as a starting point
akots: Emp, can you just load the latest save and see there?
EMP: I can try
JokerDF: Ok. Mark this hill, then mark the Grassland with the tobaco at the right (that was a hill at south)
akots: OK
JokerDF: Now the grassland at the right that was a jungle at North and a grassland at South and a tobaco at the Southeast
akots: OK, three tiles in a row
JokerDF: yes! Hill - Grass with Tocabo - Grass empty
akots: I then mark another grassland to the east coast
JokerDF: you are a smart one
User EMP left this room
JokerDF: that you would be a part you YOUR territory, and everything south of it of course
JokerDF: * of your territory
akots: Guess Emp tryied to load C3C and his comp revolted
Krasan: :0
JokerDF:
JokerDF: Got it akots? All the 3 tabaco fields would be yours, and that darn jungle ours lol
akots: I'm running C3C, mirc, paint, and TV on the background and still doing OK
JokerDF:
akots: Jungle means grassland in the future
JokerDF: will we go this far at the game?
akots: To tell the truth, if it were for me I won't be very greedy
akots: Looks fine with this proespective border
akots: These areas would be very corrupt
JokerDF: and it could be changed with time
JokerDF: yes, indeed
akots: Hence, little benefit to own them
akots: Can we slide it an a non-official declaration without consequences just a project
akots: and base for future negotiations
JokerDF: declaration saying waht?
User EMP entered this room
EMP: now, exlaine to me slowly, where the start point it
EMP: *is
JokerDF: akots can you send a map with the marks to EMP?
JokerDF: cant send, relus
JokerDF: rules
EMP: I do not see akots
JokerDF: oh gosh
EMP: now I do
EMP: now I don't
EMP: BAH, this is starting to get very annyoing
JokerDF: yes...
akots: I have saved the jpeg with the border and somehow even got the chatlog to this point
akots: but it keeps throwing me out
EMP: now I see akots talk
JokerDF: lol....
JokerDF: akots can you send it to EMP?
Krasan: lol
EMP: akots, can you please e mail me a picture of the propsed border
akots: I can just post it in the Embassy thread
EMP: good, doo that
JokerDF: ok, but i did not understand you dont you want do make it formal
User EMP left this room
akots: It is too early
akots: Not that we want more of the land
JokerDF: That's why would be one that could be changed.
akots: We can try to poll this after some discussion
akots: There is no point to formalize something which can be changed
akots: I'll start the discussion
Krasan: but is good make it formal to prevent future misunderstandings
JokerDF: sure is has a point, to avoid discussings.
Krasan: after the pool
akots: Also, we have elections now and there would be a new Consul of Foreign Affairs
akots: Ankka is not running this time
akots: would be probably Matrix
Krasan: humm
JokerDF: sure, but the country can stop can it ?
JokerDF: ops, cant stop
Krasan: and you? are running for something?
akots: Yep, I'm playing the saves now
User EMP entered this room
akots: But elections have not finished yet
akots: ...
 
JokerDF: So anything else?
akots: Just wanted to discuss a suggestion
akots: Just give it a thought do not need to answer now
EMP: techs
Krasan: shoot
akots: Oh, yes, we have voted and Code of Laws leads so far
akots: Apparently, we would be researching CoL and then Currency
JokerDF: Ok, Col for courthouse?
akots: And we will send you MapMaking in ... 2 or 3 turns
Krasan: 2 or 3 turns?.. uow
akots: When is your research on Monarchy scheduled
akots: We need also to decide whether we will revolt to Monarchy or wait to Republic
JokerDF: havent you decedid to go to Monarchy with us? this was already discussed
akots: This has to be voted
Krasan: i supose it to
JokerDF: but you told us tade you voted it
JokerDF: *that
akots: At present, outcome of the vote cannot be predicted
akots: No, IIRC it has not been polled
EMP: it was
JokerDF: lol, i have the logs here... one chat you said that you would vote it, the other one you said that you voted and that you going to monarchy with us
Krasan: yes
akots: Let me check with the forum
User Saturno entered this room
JokerDF: Saturno! welcome
Krasan: hi saturno
Saturno: hello!
EMP: Greetings
akots: hi
Saturno: Who is akots?
akots: there were 2 polls
EMP: akots is Minister of the military
akots: One was awhile ago and it ended by deciding that we should revolt to Republic
EMP: though soon to be Minister of Internal affairs
Saturno: ok, sorry proceed...
akots: ANother was more recent and it was decided that we go for Monarchy
EMP: yes
akots: Together with you
JokerDF: akots: as i recall you had 2 pools, one after that decided for monarchy
akots: I'm really confused
JokerDF: yes, as you said
akots: We need to make a more clear decision
JokerDF: one more? and that would be even more cofusing...
JokerDF: i think that was like that:
akots: But if you revolt to Monarchy, are you planning to stay there or revolt to Republic when it is discovered?
akots: The problem is that in this case there would be 2 periods of Anarchy and Anarchy as you know is deleterious to the economy
JokerDF: you made a poll, them after we discussed, yuyou made another one
JokerDF: i dont think that we would even reseach republic
akots: Here comes the game plan.
Krasan: 2 periods of anarchy?
akots: The only situation when this can be reasonable is that we go for the other continent
akots: Early on with our AC-JT combo and your Immortals
JokerDF: i think that just monarchy would be ok, forgeting republic
akots: If we don't do this, CDZ would easily outresearch us
akots: and outproduce as well
JokerDF: republic will take long to discover, and as you said 2 anarchys is not good
akots: Usuallly research in Republic is about 2 times faster than in Monarchy
akots: CDZ apparently went to Republic early
Krasan: but we are already searching monarchy
akots: Since they had Alphabet as a starting tech
akots: So, while we are in Despotism now
akots: They are probably Republic for a long time already
akots: I would say it is possible that they are in the middle ages
JokerDF: Cost of republic: 28, Monarchy: 24. And we are at monarchy as krasan said
Krasan: why you think the CDZ have republic ?
EMP: yea how do you know
akots: It is a know trick called "Republic sligshot"
akots: Research Writing, Code of Laws, then Philosophy, and pick Republic as a free tech
akots: On Emperor level and Standard map size it can be done on turn 60
JokerDF: that's ok, but midle ages, too soon
EMP: but aaren't they at war?
Krasan: i agree with joker
akots: They may be but still this reduces tech cost for them
JokerDF: i dont know, but we missed the point! lets get back
akots: To where?
JokerDF: So, lets move on?
EMP: ok
akots: ok
EMP: what si next
EMP: Now, citizens of CFc an C3B, I would to to propose a tech treaty
EMP: one that we share all of our techs with eachother, in an attempt to out-tech the other alliance
JokerDF: share as soon as we discover it right?
EMP: and we will both go on differnt paths inorder to make the most of time
JokerDF: without costs
EMP: unless otherwise agreed upon
EMP: and free
EMP: I have a small draft
EMP: I do not now if it wil let me fit it in here
EMP: II - Technological Parity
EMP: bah, I wil just e mail it
JokerDF: ok. But we would have to put something saying that a civ may not put tech at 0% (or 10%,20%) and jsut get techs
JokerDF: yes, email it
EMP: e mails please
User RikMeleet entered this room
User RikMeleet left this room
EMP: hello there Rik
JokerDF: and bye rik
Krasan: lol
EMP: :p
User RikMeleet entered this room
EMP: let's see if he stays
RikMeleet: Hello
JokerDF: hi rik
EMP: good hello there
RikMeleet: Opera browser is not very suitable for this chatroom....
JokerDF: EMP, so email me the agreement
EMP: I did
EMP: anyone else like a copy
RikMeleet: 1 big yellow page with just a few boxes "Say", "B" ,"I" and "U"
RikMeleet: still continuing ?
EMP: yes yes
akots: hi Rik
RikMeleet: Hello Akots.
Krasan: hi Rik
RikMeleet: I've got a question for C3B
JokerDF: "Any technology researched co-operatively "
JokerDF: reserched cooperatively?
RikMeleet: Can I ask it now ?
EMP: one sec
EMP: want me t change that
JokerDF: i did not underestand that.... which one research a tech, but we don research co-operatively
JokerDF: one moment rik
EMP: ok I will get rid of the word co-operatively
EMP: Any technology researched is to be shared between the two parties of this pact.
EMP: good?
JokerDF: Yes... but all this tech trade, dont say that as soon as we reseach it we have to give to the other party
EMP: Any technology researched is to be shared between the two parties of this pact as soon as it is researched, unless otherwise agreed upon.
EMP: good?
JokerDF: yes. And "shared without costs", because is not a trade
EMP: Any technology researched is to be shared between the two parties of this pact as soon as it is researched, for no cost, unless otherwise agreed upon
JokerDF: Yes, and put that at the top of the agreement, because is the main deal of the agreement
EMP: done?
EMP: and what artical is this?
JokerDF: At "both nation will show full" add that one party may not stop researching or reduce drastically the researchy without telling the other one the reasons and so
JokerDF: Article 6
EMP: Both nations will show full disclosure on their economic situation, and act accordingly. O party may not stop researching or reduce drastically the research without telling the other one the reasons and so
JokerDF: take out the "and so" too informal
EMP: Both nations will show full disclosure on their economic situation, and act accordingly. A party may not stop researching or reduce drastically the research without telling the other one the reasons.
JokerDF: good
EMP: we done?
EMP: with techs
JokerDF: yes, may you send me the final version?
EMP: yes
EMP: now rick you had a question for our fine freinds
RikMeleet: Yes I do.
EMP: we will discuss and make a pool
RikMeleet: The last C3B-CFC chat I was in, C3B hadn\\'t explored their lands so C3B was not sure how much land there is in their region. Has C3B more knowledge on the quantity of land now ?
RikMeleet: Is my question visible ?
EMP: to me
JokerDF: yes
I have to leave now; EMP will you be around for the answer ?
----
(Eu cai e voltei)
---
EMP: good
JokerDF: do you read me?
EMP: now
EMP: I do
akots: The room kicked me out again
JokerDF: so about territory... the size of our territory i think, it too relative, we dont know the size of yours so we dont have how to measure
EMP: how about by blocks
User Krasan entered this room
JokerDF: do you want be to count blocks? lol Why dont you see as the Victory screen the % of each one
JokerDF: this would solve it
EMP: or just ask and we will get somone to count them
JokerDF: i will hire someone to do so, a new government job lol
JokerDF: exploration would solve it too
JokerDF: anything else?
EMP: nope
EMP: I will post the polls tonight
JokerDF: so see you then
 
akots said:
There were a couple of important aspects discussed regarding CDZ and other civs and I did not like Joker's attitude. He just tried to avoid the subject and switched to some research agreement like the questions were not asked.
I agree akots. His attitude wasn't likable. This didn't seem like a very productive chat.
 
Back
Top Bottom