The Education Debate

Simon Darkshade

Mysterious City of Gold
Joined
Apr 8, 2001
Messages
10,296
Location
Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
This is a thread inspired by some of the recent discussions in the "US Marines in Afghanistan" thread, which moved onto peoples attitudes towards, experiences of, and beliefs about education, particularly the tertiary variety, what is known to US barbarians as "college";).

So here, I would like to initiate some discussion on the matter, teasing out some more of the notions raised by both sides. The main area of difference that was beginning to come out was disagreement over paying for college, among other associated notions.
In the antipodies, where I make my residence, upfront payment is not a factor for the vast majority, as tuition fees are deferred until completion of the degree, indeed until a certain income level is reached. Once this occurs, they start taking amounts out of your pay in order to pay off the debt. The system is known as HECS, or Higher Education Contribution Scheme.

It was instituted in the 1980s; prior to this, university was free (I may be wrong about some of the occurences prior to the late 1960s, but it was free in the very early 1970s. Anyway, I digress) The irony of this system is that the right wing ideologues/politicians who are currently savaging the universities, and boosting HECS, are those who had the benefit of a free education in the 1970s.
This system only covers tuition; residency costs extra, but is not a major factor at the universities, at least the one I attend, with only a few hundred living in the colleges out of about 15000 students. Text books and books of photocopied readings are also up to the individual to pay for, although there are moves afoot to challenge this. Added to this are a host of incidental fees and expenses, outside of the cost of normal living.

The end result is that even with HECS deferment, the general populace of the university can be characterised as the private school mob. There are of course many not from the old institutions, from the state system, but they are not in proportion to the rest of society. There are also many overseas fee paying students, which is great for the bank book of the university, but does take places away.
Now, I know I can't really talk, being an old boy of the establishment, but there is an imbalance there that no one is inclined to address, and it is this that helps perpetuate class barriers. There are simply some jobs that would laugh at a secondary school diploma, instead of at least an Honours degree. There are some scholarships, but they are generally into highly vocational/corporatised areas, such as Shell sponsoring a school of petroleum engineering, or something to that effect.
This may not be a new situation to our American friends, but it is just emerging down here. But, this doesn't really effect me personally.
I went through schools on scholarships from Year 4, and have qualifications and a job that Hecs does not matter. So why do I care?
Because everyone deserves to have the same opportunities, or at least a shot at them. That ain't happening under the present model, and it ain't due to laziness on behalf of the individual.

So, this is part 1 of my musings. I'll see if there is any response.
If there is not, then I will have to execute my hostage, Russell Crowe.;)
 
The education system in this country (U.S.) is quite screwed up. As a high school student, I have to keep my GPA very high (by being in 5 AP classes, which count for a total of 5.0 each instead of 4.0) to have a chance at getting into a university of any sort without bankrupting my family. Since each of these classes only contains about 30 people, how much of a chance do others in my predicament have? Only the top 5% get full scholarships (only the top 5% get any scholarship to NAU
 
The higher education system in Canada is the responcibility of the provinces (or states). So in Ontario (where I live) there are four ways to get through Higher Eduaction.

#1- Be Rich

#2- Get a full scholarship. Not a bad program in Canada, Few get them but at least it doesn't go to athletes (Scholarships for people excelling in athletics are not allowed above the level of $2000 (about $1200 US) or at least thats how I belevie it goes.)

These two methods are used by allmost nobody. Most people get loans and for loans we have two systems.

#3- OSAP (I forget what it stands for). This is an interest free loan for people who could not go to university for economic reasons. The amount of money you get depends on how much your parents make. High income means less money, low income means more money.

#4 Bank Loans- Works similarily to that of the American system.


Now, guess which option I use to go to school. NONE.

#1- Not rich so I have to work while I go to school (I am a full-time student).

#2- Yeah right, maybe one percent get this. Hell the best student in my high school couldn't get this and she is surviving on a bunch of partial scholarships (she jokes she spent more time apply for scholarships then doing homework in her last year of highscholl)

#3- My parents make too much money

#4- My parents are in too much debt to cosign my loan.

So basically I live at home and commute two hours a day (roundtrip) to go school. I have absolutly no spending money, and I couldn't even afford my books for this semester until TWO MONTHS into the course. Then on top of that I have to work near full time to be able to pay tuition for next semester.

For some reason people think that post-secondary school in Canada is free, i don't know why. While its not as expensive as in the states, it still costs ALOT>
 
here in sweden we have system that allows you to take a loan that gives you about 500$ + about 100$ in subsidies per month. then when you have finished your studies you pay back 5%, i´m not sure but i think it´s 5%, of your income until you get retired or all money is payed back. it´s something in that way.
 
Oh yeah and in Ontario (and most of Canada) there are two types of post-secondary education. Their are Colleges (applied art & technology stuff) these are for people who want to get a job as fast as possible and you can get well paying jobs if you learn a trade (my friend took a two year electrician apprenticeship and her starting wage after college was about 40K) Then there is University. These are more education then job training. I go to college for now, planning to transfer to University next year (this happens alot)
 
Originally posted by Whiskey Priest

#3- OSAP (I forget what it stands for). This is an interest free loan for people who could not go to university for economic reasons. The amount of money you get depends on how much your parents make. High income means less money, low income means more money.

This is my last post in off topic. I swear. I just have to clear up something here since I live in Ontario as well. I'm not debating.. just pointing some things out.

OSAP is only interest free for the duration of your education. After that interest starts kicking in and it's fairly high. I think it's prime + 1%

The problem with OSAP is that a fairly middle class family makes "too much" for any meaningfull loan... So you still don't end up with all that much money.

And when you do - you end up in debter's hell anyway.
 
You're right. I forgot some of the details.
 
I think the education system here in the US works great. There are many different levels of post-high school education. There are the top private schools that everybody knows about like Princeton, Stanford, MIT, etc. that cost up to $40,000 a year to go to. Then there are other levels of public and private schools all the way down to community and technical/trade colleges which just cost a few hundred dollars a year to attend.

Most people go to state universities, which are four-year schools that also have graduate schools, and pay about $5,000 a year, or to the two-year community colleges that I mentioned earlier. Also, there are many scholarships, grants, and loans that are provided to students, so that if you are willing to work hard you can go anywhere you want.

During high school pretty much all I did was work towards getting into a good college and being able to afford it, and my school didn't even weight the AP (Advanced Placement) courses to be any higher than regular courses. An example is my senior year: I took eight classes a day (six of which were AP, plus two AP courses the year before) while my school normally only offers six, which meant I took an extra class before and after school. This compares to most seniors, who take only four or five classes their senior year because they want to take a break. I was President of my school's chapter of the Honor Society, which involved lots of community service. I was the Community Liaison for my school, for which I organized all sorts of events including a food drive where we brought in over 13,000 lbs. of food, an "Adopt-A-Family" program where we supported nine families, a "Pennies For Patients" event where we brought in several thousand dollars to help fight Leukemia (cancer of the blood), and many other projects. Also, I was in a community service group called Keshamen, I served on a school-district board to enhance the "Gifted Education" programs in the district, and I played the trumpet in a number of different musical groups including the Jazz Band, Evergreen Philharmonic Orchestra, Wind Ensemble, Baroque Brass, Marching Band, Pep Band, and put together a brass quintet to go to state competition. Now all this doesn't include grades or test scores, because it shows how you have to work really hard during high school in addition to getting good grades to get into a good college.

I am now attending Johns Hopkins University, one of those private schools that costs $40,000 a year, however I can't afford to fork out $40,000 extra for school each year. The way it works is after all the hard work in high school I got grants, loans, and scholarships to be able to go here.

I find it pretty amazing how well the American education system works. My grandparent's generation in my family didn't go to any school after high school (and I'm not sure they all finished regular school at that). They were just regular farmers and loggers. Then my parent's generation all went to state schools, which at the time cost about $200 a year to go to, and they all graduated with a standard four-year education. Now my generation are all going to very prestigious institutions, even though we are only a middle-class family. My sister is in her senior year at Vassar College in New York, and did her junior year abroad at Oxford University in England.

Now this brings me to what I know about in England: that their top universities (Oxford, Cambridge, etc.) were completely free for a long time, and all that it took to get in were good grades, test scores, and similar work to what I did. Now they do have a fee, but it is only 1,000 pounds, not much compared to the type of education you are getting.

This just goes to show that anybody, and I mean ANYBODY, can get the best education the world has to offer if they are willing to do hard work. In high-school I was surrounded by people who were satisfied with taking easy classes, not doing anything extra, and complaining about only getting into a state school or community college. I found it really annoying that they thought they should get everything without any work on their part, and that they weren't satisfied with the education they were going to get anyway, which was better than what most people have available to them in other countries.
 
Originally posted by omichyron
The education system in this country (U.S.) is quite screwed up. As a high school student, I have to keep my GPA very high (by being in 5 AP classes, which count for a total of 5.0 each instead of 4.0) to have a chance at getting into a university of any sort without bankrupting my family. Since each of these classes only contains about 30 people, how much of a chance do others in my predicament have? Only the top 5% get full scholarships (only the top 5% get any scholarship to NAU

Well, sh!t. If you're only looking to go Ivy league then you're right...you either have to be rich to afford it, or have fantastic grades to get a full (or even partial) ride. But there are so many more options available to you.

There's what? ten universities in the Ivy league...each one charging $40,000 - $60,000 a year (and some per semester). The only thing that makes Ivy league schools special is the prestige they carry and perhaps some time down the road when you're in an interview someone will hire you because they went to the same school as you. Believe me, you can get an education that's just as good in a mainstream university.

As for the question of paying for it. If you know where to look, anyone can pay for college with little fiscal damage to themselves. First of all, you can apply for a federal education grant (some states also give out education grants). Right there you get free money to go to college. The amount you recieve depends on the annual income of your family and the major you want to go for. I have a freind whose family is poor as dirt and all through high school they said "we can't pay for college." Then he applied for a grant and the Feds gave him enough money to cover 3/4 of his tuition. Now he's in college and loving every minute of it.

Then you have FAFSA (a seperate federal entity). It's a little more restricive then a federal education grant but still supplies a whole heap of money to students without enought money to go to college. You can, in fact, apply for both an education grant and FAFSA simultaneously.

Then there are all manner of scholarships. You've got your academic sholarships, sports scholarships, organizational scholarships, business scholarships, etc. Most people look to academic or sports scholarships to get them a free ride all through college, but the rest are for the most part untapped resources. I've applied for dozens of smaller scholarships (some only $250- $1000) through various organizations and businesses and gotten several of them. They won't alone give you a free ride, but a handfull of them will easily pay for books, part of your tuition, or your fees.

Then, of course, there are all sorts of jobs that will give you tuition reimbursement. I work at UPS and they give me $2000 dollars a year with a max payout of $10,000 (and if you're management you get double that). UPS is only one of the thousands of companies that do that for their employees.

I don't want anyone in the U.S. to complain that they can't pay for college. If you can't, you just aren't trying. With all the federal aide and tax breaks I've recieved in addition to the reimbursement plan, I'm paying only about $700-$800 every year for my college. And I'm not going to to a half-assed school either. I'm at one of the biggest universities in the Nation -the University of Utah.

...and no one can say to me that they'll get a better education at an Ivy League school. The whole "I paid most people's yearly salary for four months worth of school and therefore got the best education available" mentality is nonsense. Besides, if you're busting your ass 24/7 just to keep up your grades enough to get even a partial academic scholarship and you can only barely handle it: STOP! It's not going to end once you get that scholarship. You're going to have to apply for that scholarship every year (some colleges every semester) and if you don't hold your own, that scholarship goes to someone else. They'll also hold you to a much higher standard then other students. I've had freinds lose their free rides just because they unfortuneatly missed a class that was checked on by the administration.
 
I'm not talking about Ivy League schools, I'm talking about the U of A and the NAU. These are normal state universities (the University of Arizona and the Northern Arizona University). I don't technically qualify for any particular federal aid, even though both of my parents are teachers and make what is probably defined in the Arizona state constitution as "squat".:lol:
 
Hey, BlueMonday, stop bashing my school (Cornell). ;)

You should choose your school based on its reputation in the fields you are interested in. I didn't come here because it was Ivy. I came here because it has a pretty government department (love my current proffessor Theodore Lowi), and the Psych and History ain't bad either. We're also good at Agriculture and engineering.

With the advertisement out of the way, we surely don't hold a monopoly on knowledge though. However, I know at Cornell gives out a lot of need-based scholarships. With that being said, I must admit my parents are fully paying for my ride. (Ok, I did some summer jobs).

Ah, Ezra's honor has been saved. Time to continue my plan to stop those Havard kids from taking over the world :goodjob: (P.S. MAJOR grade inflation there, it's very funny)
 
University Education: good for :confused:

Quote:

"I've had freinds lose their free rides just because they unfortuneatly missed a class that was checked on by the administration."

In a year I miss enough lectures and practicals to fit any arts/humanities degree in...and still pass with no work...highly rigourous :p

"Now this brings me to what I know about in England: that their top universities (Oxford, Cambridge, etc.) were completely free for a long time, and all that it took to get in were good grades, test scores, and similar work to what I did. Now they do have a fee, but it is only 1,000 pounds, not much compared to the type of education you are getting. "

It costs alot more than 1000 pounds...paying for accomodation, food, fieldtrips (spent £1200 this summer in Spain fieldmapping) etc All because employers take people on with degrees even though most aren't practical for anything -DON'T think I or virtually anyone doing my degree which is practical want to be field geologists!

My main gripes about university is the lack of direction and the worthless nature of the resources to hand...libraries suck, the internet is pathetically organised in terms of presentation of intellectual material (at least in geology) and scientific journals are just endless case examples of one technique being replicated at various locations and then built up into some sort of theory. And what is it for? it isn't practical training in most cases for a job but simply a way to maintain a system...

I am sure they'll be some disagreements with people that got alot out of university -especially fun! (though that is drinking for so many people)- and especially musicians and sportsmen/woman, but for those who take on interests and don't need a platform like university and who are here ultimately to get a good job -with the least possible work to do it- it plain sux and has done my brain in.
 
Ah I have something to look forward to then in one and a half years time...I am still at school doing A levels so I have a nice easy ride at the moment.
 
Given that I dropped out of college after two years, I find it curious that all of the Ivy-leaguers and such posting here have such lousy grammatical and spelling skills; while my typos and errors could fill a sentence, theirs could fill a manuscript.

I educated myself for the most part. My Regent's Diploma got me a whole $62.50 per semester, enough to buy one book and a highlighter to mark it up with. I wasted most of a trust fund that my grandparents set up for me on a college education that wasn't teaching me anything useful in my chosen profession (games software developer). Consider me soured on the whole college experience.

My current job is a highly technical one that I find both mentally stimulating and financially rewarding, and I got it without a degree. I was able to demonstrate my abilities to my prospective employer, and the rest is history.

The education you recieve at the foot of a wise man is better than that any university can offer. Be warned.

EDIT: to correct spelling errors and typos. ;)
 
Originally posted by omichyron
I'm not talking about Ivy League schools, I'm talking about the U of A and the NAU. These are normal state universities (the University of Arizona and the Northern Arizona University). I don't technically qualify for any particular federal aid, even though both of my parents are teachers and make what is probably defined in the Arizona state constitution as "squat".:lol:

Yes you do qualify for federal aide. Anybody in America who fills out the forms correctly will get money from the goverenment for college. The amount you get depends on the annual income of your parents. Secondly, universities in your state of residence will give you a tax break (at least in all the states I know of). I know that at the U of U my tuition is half of what it would be because I'm a Utah resident.
 
We have a very good educational system in Belgium.Everybody that want's to go to a university or college get's a sholarship ,depending on the social class you come from.Poor family's (like mine :( ) get almost all their costs payed back.In Belgium everybody has the possibilety to study. :)
 
Another option in the US of course is the GI Bill--i.e., you serve your four years in the military, and they pay for your college (up to $50K I believe, more than enough for most state universities or tech schools).

Is this option available in Canada or elsewhere? It's a good benefit, I think....
 
Originally posted by Whiskey Priest

So basically I live at home and commute two hours a day (roundtrip) to go school. I have absolutly no spending money, and I couldn't even afford my books for this semester until TWO MONTHS into the course. Then on top of that I have to work near full time to be able to pay tuition for next semester.

For some reason people think that post-secondary school in Canada is free, i don't know why. While its not as expensive as in the states, it still costs ALOT>

How could you afford to buy Civ3?
 
Back
Top Bottom