I am the Future
Oi Oi Oi !!!
Vote as you Wish in all polls at less asked otherwise
Illini Rule said:what are we for in the polls or are we neutral in all of them
Daghdha said:I read somewhere a post by IatF saying the party don't wanna be mocked (and then, as I read it, the reason why) because it is political roleplay. I'm just curious about whether that kind of roleplay differs from all the other roleplaying in here and, if so, in what way. As I see it, your Orwellian manifesto has a target painted on it's chest screaming to be hit by loads of mud. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a main purpous...to be provocative? I think that is 100% OK and I whish you lots of fun with it, but why the offended tone when it's just goofin around?
Oh, I know it's just a game, but even so we are real people interacting. Some participants differ on how "real" or how "act" they are. Some post as the person behind the nick, i.e. what they really think about stuff while others are taking on a "forum personality" and act out opininons/behaviour that is just for play. No way is better than the other, but if we don't recognize that difference we can easily end up in meaningless disputes. The intention with my initial question was not to criticise you in any way, only to figure out whether the Party stance was "for real" in some way, or just an act. I've understood it as just an act and that's cool and I'm delighted to read IatF saying that this role-play can (perhaps) show that majority decisions can be badkoondrad said:Don't ever forget that this is a demogame.
Daghdha said:Oh, I know it's just a game, but even so we are real people interacting. Some participants differ on how "real" or how "act" they are. Some post as the person behind the nick, i.e. what they really think about stuff while others are taking on a "forum personality" and act out opininons/behaviour that is just for play. No way is better than the other, but if we don't recognize that difference we can easily end up in meaningless disputes. The intention with my initial question was not to criticise you in any way, only to figure out whether the Party stance was "for real" in some way, or just an act. I've understood it as just an act and that's cool and I'm delighted to read IatF saying that this role-play can (perhaps) show that majority decisions can be bad, which is quite the opposite of the manifesto. If you honestly, as the person behind the nick and not the role-player, think that the manifesto is a piece of crap, then you should welcome posts that criticise it, right?
I do see the problem with taking on a role-opinion that is very different to you real life opinion....
Lyckily for me I'm a member of the Idiot's Partee so I don't have to deal with that![]()
SOunds like thought crimeGoldstein's book
I was actually referring to Jonathan Goldstein's book, "Schmelvis: In Search of Elvis Presley's Jewish Roots"I am the Future said:SOunds like thought crime![]()
koondrad said:I was actually referring to Jonathan Goldstein's book, "Schmelvis: In Search of Elvis Presley's Jewish Roots"![]()
That is of course true.Anyways, Oceania will prevail
I dont wish to sound cocky, but I dare say taht we could be at the mediteranian by the end of the week. And have the Iberian penninsula shortly after.koondrad said:What is the latest report from the Eurasian front?