The poll to stop any other hitler threads.

Hitler should be in future incarnations of the civilization series.

  • Yes

    Votes: 134 48.2%
  • No

    Votes: 144 51.8%

  • Total voters
    278
Status
Not open for further replies.

Severus

Warlord
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Messages
137
I am sick of the constant threads about whether hitler should, or should not, be included in future games of civ. The merits for both sides have been debated over and over yet still new threads are started on this topic. This is why i propose that anyone who feels the need to start another thread, or who has grown tired of the question, should simply vote yes or no in this poll and then let firaxis decide. Let the voting begin...
 
Yeah you are right. I think that some people from firaxis saw those threads about hitler already and they got the point, so please stop crying about this evil nazi over and over again .
 
This will not stop the threads but is unfortuntaley another Hitler Thread.
Pople post becuase they belive that their Point of View is important and no one will read it in a post

So just let the thread sink to the Gorund
 
Yes because they included bastards like joseph stalin and mao.
 
I'm going with yes because when you think of a German leader, a lot of people are going to say that nazi Adolf Hitler. He also helped revolutionize mobile warfare with his Blitzkreig tactics.
 
They should make a patch/update/expansion that you can buy or download off of their site with all the brutal dictators and scenarios. So then its up to you if you wish to have them in or not.


The fact of the matter though, is many of the current leaders in civ have been just as brutal as Hitler. But over time people forget and it just doesn't bother them as much. In 100 years and if there was a Civ20 Hitler will surely be in the Vanilla with all of the other brutal dictators of today and yesterday.
 
I'm going with yes because when you think of a German leader, a lot of people are going to say that nazi Adolf Hitler. He also helped revolutionize mobile warfare with his Blitzkreig tactics.
Slightly off topic, but Heinz Guderian did more to develop Blitzkrieg tactics than almost anyone else in Germany. Hitler merely promoted their use, dragging the world into war.
Hitler as a statesman knew how to get Germany to do his bidding, but as a rule the less he interfered with German operational tactics, the better the German Army did in battle.
 
Rewording Tekee's comment.

Tekee said:
This will not stop the threads but is unfortuntaley another Hitler Thread.

The irony. This is not the first poll either. As like all the other polls it will:

sink to the Ground

But only when someone:

post becuase they believe that their Point of View is important and no one will read it in a post.
 
*shrug*

How about a new rule... Start a "Why isn't hitler in?" type thread and get banned. No exceptions. No excuses.

Not that I think sucha rule SHOULD be implemented but it is the only chance of stoping the brainless twits who feel that they must start a new thread on the subject every couple days.
 
like Xanikk said if they include mao and stalin then they surely have to put hitler in too.
 
If Firaxis should ever be mad enough to market a version of Civ where one can play as Hitler, I would, for the first time ever, refuse to buy it. I'd be as likely to buy a game called "Camp Auschwitz". Since there are undoubtedly a great many people who would react the same way, I find it highly unlikely that those who apparently would like to play as Hitler in Civ will ever have their wish fulfilled.

When someone trots out the hackneyed argument that Mao and Stalin are included, so why not H., that does not change my mind. Nor, I submit, does it change the mind of others who feel the same way about this.

Öjevind
 
I voted yes. Ofcourse I hate the man and wish he never lived at all. But since he did, I'd like to fight against him in civ. And destroy him ofcourse. Tha-Bstard.
 
Why not just make a sticky named "Discussion about Hitler and other problematics leaders in CIV" and forbid people to make threads about it? Only post in that thread..So easier..
 
Barney's_Soul said:
Yes because Stalin and Napoleon are there.

Mao? An? An?
 
Norseman2 said:
18-19, wow, this poll has been remarkably decisive.

I bet the poll ends up at close to 50/50. Which means a victory for the 'nos' because if it is so controversial that you are going to please/offend the same amount of people to put it in why bother messing with it at all?

I haven't voted. I don't care if he is put in or not. It's a freakin' game. Fix the UN, work on the modern ages so they arent so ******** and worthless, etc. Hitler is the least of my worries. But I do find it funny that people keep starting Hitler threads with "last", "Hitler", and "thread" in the title. What are we on now... like 20?

I think it is a little overboard to ban/boycott the game if he was put in but people are petty. It isn't like leaders of the world are only doing their duty in the hopes of an honorable mention in the game civ. I don't know, this whole topic is rubbish to me.

Get to modding. ;)
 
King Flevance said:
I bet the poll ends up at close to 50/50. Which means a victory for the 'nos' because if it is so controversial that you are going to please/offend the same amount of people to put it in why bother messing with it at all?

I haven't voted. I don't care if he is put in or not. It's a freakin' game. Fix the UN, work on the modern ages so they arent so ******** and worthless, etc. Hitler is the least of my worries. But I do find it funny that people keep starting Hitler threads with "last", "Hitler", and "thread" in the title. What are we on now... like 20?

I think it is a little overboard to ban/boycott the game if he was put in but people are petty. It isn't like leaders of the world are only doing their duty in the hopes of an honorable mention in the game civ. I don't know, this whole topic is rubbish to me.

Get to modding. ;)

Yeah i dont particularly care either, although i'd rather he wasnt because he didnt do enough to be thought of as one of germany's greatest ever leaders, but if he is he is, if he isnt he isnt, either way i'll stay play the game.
I was just hoping that people feeling the need to keep rambling on about the topic might just choose to cast a vote here so we dont keep getting new threads started all the time going over the same old ground.

And yes, i know this is another hitler thread but thanks anyway for the wonderfully incisive comment tekee zzzzz......

Anyway i was just interested as to the numbers on either side, that's all.
 
I hear ya, man. But don't be shocked when next month's hitler thread opens up. ;)

I think most members are tired of it by now. But next month or so a new member will join and after they ask all the newbie questions and see the amount of feedback, they will mention hitler and off we go again. :lol:

It may be something that will never end. But having one always present does present crowd control.

Each side has good arguements as to why they are right but in the end it is Firaxis who makes the call. And I believe Germany will refuse the product if they do put him in. Which means no possibility for German money to be made so he probably won't make it in.

I am not trying to discourage the poll. I apologize if I came off wrong, I was just merely having fun with the concept. :) Vote away. I didn't vote, nor will I most likely. But I have been watching the results which have stayed 50/50 so far.
 
If Stalin and Mao are in (those two killed a lot more of their own people than Hitler), Adolf sure can be in. Simple as that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom