There is ample opportunity all through the year to respect gays, since as you said, gay Truronians will still be around. It doesn't get diminished by using the flagpole to help build pride in something of which everyone can be proud.
I guess I think of tolerance towards gays as something that a community could take pride in, but I uderstand thats probably more of a personal beleif. Again, if Truro had a festival to celebrate its scottish heritage and flew the Saint Andrew's Cross for a week, wouldn't that be excluding a lot of people as well? Bet folks wouldn't get as upset though....
Every time the council flies a flag that doesn't cover everyone, it's marginalising someone. I think it quite symbolic that they fly the national flag (or perhaps a regional one, if there is one). It's not drawing distinctions: it's pledging themselves to one concern, and that concern is all of us.
I guess I come from the viewpoint that gays and lesbians are marginalized on a daily basis in Truro. If flying a flag for one week a year helps break that down a bit, I say go for it...
Atlas14 said:
The precedent the gay flag flying sets is not a $6.99 set amount...mullet pride, hunter's pride, left-handed pride, its all just nonsense. The government doesn't need to be appealing to special interest groups lin this manner, there are bigger issues.
Putting gay pride in the same catagory as mullets, hunters and lefties is a bit of a stretch, IMHO, but I'll take it as dramatic hyperbole. Integrating gays into a community where life can be difficult for them is a big issue, and one that Truro should be thinking more about.
They can realize the city council supports their right to live there by flying a gay pride flag on their own house, and realizing that it is not going to be taken down any time soon. Acceptance doesn't come from the flying of flags, it comes from speech, actions, and intentions.
Then why bother flying the Canadian flag, if it's speech, actions, and intentionsthat count? Being able to fly at flag at your own house is the most minimal right a person can have when it comes to expression. If Truro wants to be serious about actions and intentions when it comes to gay pride, then it can show that it is not afraid to support the gay community by flying thier flag.
Huh? If I wanted people to accept my German heritage and share in my pride, why on earth would I fly a German-American looking flag on town council's door?
Why not? It would raise awareness of your heritage, get people talking, and maybe get them thinking about thier own heritage. And it is that much more meaningful if it is flown by town council, instead of a single person's home.
The idea of flying a gay pride flag by the order of the town council is laughable. It is unecessary, and in my opinion shows favoritism.
The idea of a mayor justifying it by quoting the bible is pretty laughable to me, and shows some favouratism towards Truro's religious majority, but as long as minorities don't get special treatment....
Gays, nor any other group of citizens, should expect extraordinary treatment of any kind unless it is vital to that group's preservation, culture, or lifestyle. A flag hardly fits that description.
I guess that is where our opinions differ: flying a flag to me is a strong show of support for the rights and lives of the people it represents. In a town that has problems with homophobia, it can do a lot for teh preservation of that community, even if it just encourages queer folk to stay.