I think it's time to start at least discussing this:
Situation:
- we're in 675 BC, turn 88
- we're 2 techs away from Lib and Astro is in sight
- thanks to our ETTT we (and the other members) have a clear tech lead compared to the 2 non-ETTT teams, Mavericks and Merlot
- we're tied for a long period to an ASP with Amazon: 1000 AD is turn 210.
- if i'm not wrong, we don't have any other agreement with Quatronia and CDZ, aside the ETTT.
Question:
- do we have a rough count of the beakers we gave to the ETTT members and the beakers we received? I can read through all the diplo messages and find it myself, but if anyone already has the info, it would be useful.
Food for thought:
In any case, i suspect we gave away our advantage to have the financial trait, since we're in tech parity with 4 teams out of 6.
Do we also want to give away our free tech from Lib? to all the other 3 members of the ETTT? if so, while it's true that we can shoot high with Lib, being in tech parity with 4 teams will not provide us any advantage to win the game. It will be only a question of hammers instead of beakers.
Sure, we'll have the dikes, but this can't be enough.
Being in tech parity with Amazon for a so long period will just move the units to use in war to galleons/rifles/cannons to destroyers/marine/tanks or even bombers or nukes.
So, we give away also our UU, a galleon which can compete with frigates. And which not needs to declare before entering borders.
So, this is my proposal:
- Let's break immediately, or at least before completing Philo, the ETTT with Quatronia and CDZ;
- Let's find a way to change the terms of our agreement with Amazon, possibly after the settling of Andromeda (Anjennida? WTH, it's Andromeda, it will be where the final war will start) is agreed with Amazon.
I posted on this argument time ago, but no one gave it a f***. Can i have some answer, good answers, now?