Daghdha
Absent Minded
What do we build in DSOTM if we pop GLib in S-mountain? The Gardens? Colossus is nice, but that would be wasting shields, no?
What do we build in DSOTM if we pop GLib in S-mountain? The Gardens? Colossus is nice, but that would be wasting shields, no?
what happens if we get beaten to Glib? Cascade to ToA and/or Palace to hold the sheilds from the two cities? are we better to change S mountain to ToA until GLib comes in so we can switch DSOTM to Palace on the interturn if we get beaten so no loss of shields?
It looks like you are correct. I must have drank my beer and passed right over that one. And we are guilty of this infraction so we have to self report that (the turn after takeover from Rick to prevent a riot, I think it was in the turnlog). It seems like TimBentley or someone prevented a riot earlier too. This is kind of a silly rule IMO since it is pretty normal play in GOTM/HOF/whatever and wasnt in the first MTDG but still, good catch Othniel. Does someone want to pm Regentman or GingerAle?Perhaps this is due to my ignorance of how multiplayer works, but switching the build on the inter-turn sounds a lot like breaking into the build order, which I thought was forbidden by the rules...
It looks like you are correct.
Too few to matter IMIO. I still think we should build enough numbers to have a shield preventing landings until marines. That would be 30-40 units.I just also realized how undefended we are. Wow and kinda Did we not want to upgrade some of the warriors to Gallics for roving stop-gap defense or would they be too few to matter against a determined human invasion?
Too few to matter IMIO. I still think we should build enough numbers to have a shield preventing landings until marines. That would be 30-40 units.
They know they're stronger than us but not that it is by a stables lenght. Backstabbing a partner with a deal is an absoluteBabe's don't know we're wide-open, do they? Because if they did, and I were them, I'd stab now, deal or no deal. Right now we are at our most vulnerable and the GLib is almost online.
It seems imperative to me to have some cities pumping axes for landing prevention duty.
They know they're stronger than us but not that it is by a stables lenght. Backstabbing a partner with a deal is an absolutein my book and I know that is the opinion of a lot of Babes too. It may give a payoff in short term, but if you want to make other deals (in this or future MTDG's) you're dead meat. That's why the wording/timing of treaties are so crucial. They should be bendable but not breakable. I know there's other ways of looking at this, but me I want to be able to do diplo and be trusted, in this and in coming games. All in all, I'm not worried about Babes jumping us now that the deal is sealed.