Leif
Prince
I think that Socialism is an ideology (Myself drawing heavily from it), but what I think Aussie is trying to say is that while the USSR was named the United Soviet Socialist Republic, it wasn't socialist in action due to what is called 'state capitalism', that being the same old inequality and heirarchy all within the state. What Aussie's version of Socialism is what Socialism is supposed to be (think the Parris Commune or the Anarchist communes in Spain during it's civil war), not what one of the worst examples of things being done in it's name.Holistic said:Oh, I didn't get that. Then again, the terms are extremely mixed up. The reason why I concluded that you were trying to represent e.g. the Soviet system is that "socialism" was used by Marx to describe the transition-step between capitalism and communism (hence USSR, not USCR). Rather amusing that you used the terms in the opposite way (which is also possible, and probably more common). For less... misunderstandings "social welfare" could be an alternative, but doesn't really "sound" like an ideology (and repeats "welfare" in civics names).