What do you think is the [b]worst[/b] civ to play with?

[Bast]

Sorry, but I love the English. It's the biggest cash cow civ and the man-o-war is cool.

 

[juballs2001]

Yeah. I don't know why, but I never find a use for the Immortals. I tend to do most of my warmongering in the medieval infantry-cavalry-tank era, never fight in modern or ancient, so it really has no use for me.

man even 10 immortals with 10 catapults to attack your neighbour in 1800BC is an ability i love. This will crush ur neghbour while establishing more land for u early in the game which will pay off for u later. Persia is one of the best civs in the game. As for the worst i would have to go with the Pork and Cheese (Pertuguese or however u spell it). Terrible UU, not bad traits but u could find better in another civ with a better UU.

-Juballs

 

[digitalgoodtime]

man even 10 immortals with 10 catapults to attack your neighbour in 1800BC is an ability i love. This will crush ur neghbour while establishing more land for u early in the game which will pay off for u later. Persia is one of the best civs in the game. As for the worst i would have to go with the Pork and Cheese (Pertuguese or however u spell it). Terrible UU, not bad traits but u could find better in another civ with a better UU.

-Juballs

i agree the only problem is makeing enough spearman to garrison all the new cities : )

 

[MikeH]

America, their UU is so useless, it's like playing the game without one. At least the Hittite chariot can be used to trigger a GA when you want, with the Yanks you're dependent on being able to build a wonder at the right time, a modern era GA is not really worth waiting for.