What do you think should be on CIV4 (improvements from CIV3)?

[Chieftess]

Since there's been a recent rash of Civ4 threads again, I am merging several Civ4 threads together into one thread.

 

[Hygro]

Originally posted by Chieftess
Since there's been a recent rash of Civ4 threads again, I am merging several Civ4 threads together into one thread.

OHHHH! That's why there's soooo many posts about differant subjects all the sudden!

 

[Quandary]

Sorry my comments on the last page seem so totally unrelated to anything. I posted that before the thread got merged.

I was replying to a "Historical Accuracy" thread that suggested, in part, that large civs would break up as colonies pulled away from their empires.

 

[Ribannah]

Originally posted by sims2789

u mean the Iroquios Nation. Yes, it did exist.

It still does. And after their example, other confederacies were formed by native tribes (although never as powerful), and eventually by the colonists as well.

It would be interesting if two (or more) weak AI tribes could merge into a stronger one.

 

[Lord_all_Mighty]

New civs such the Incans, Mayans, Dutch and Portugese to name a few, and some must be from the African region in addition to the Zulu. New Traits would be great as well, these could include Agricultural(Focusing on food and Growth), Political(Concentrating on better governments and 1 turn Anarchy), Artistic(Mainly Cultural), and Barbaric(No War Weariness to starting Wars, among other things). Better Diplomacy like everyone has said would be good too.
Also, they should try to make Religion a concept that is significant to gameplay that will vary between race, for example the Greeks, Egyptians, and the Aztecs would be Mainly Polytheistic, while the Americans, and Britains would be almost all Monotheistic. What each religion affects would be decided by someone else.
I also like the concept of assigning production points to Resources and The "Firepower" Idea and giving ranged units limited Zones off control.

Of course these are my opinions