affay
Chieftain
usually, i declare a war at the middle ages for the first time. in the beginning i always pay attention to city building util i believe i will win .
All the more reason to keep theaffay said:but you know , when you declare a war , you would prepare to fight for several turns as the AI never accept your sueing for peace immediatly.Unless you have enough soldiers...
Tomoyo said:GPT is "gold per turn"
I declare war whenever it needs to be declared, from a early archer/jag rush to never declaring war. I usually fight in the middle of one of the major miliitary ages. (AA, Early Medieval, Cavalry, Artillery, Tanks, Modern)
I don`t think there are any difference . whether just start a war by attacking AI or declaring it first you are the invader,and this will take bad effect on you reputation.Shirastro said:A bit off topic.
Is there any diffrence, for your reputation, when you just start a war by attacking AI, and when you start a war by declaring it first (when you talk to that civ) ?
but I think that in the AA you should emphasis on city building as it conflict with war.For example, at the beginning, I must build settler to enlarge my territory and something else like temple to promote my cities. So, I am not able to build soldiers at the same time.The Last Conformist said:I rarely get thru the ancient age without a war or three. Indeed, it usually happens when I'm isolated on a small continent with no other civs around.