1.Which is more accessable? A real folder, or a folder on your computer? To get to the computer folder, you gotta bring it with you, you gotta turn it on, you gotta find the folder. Then you gotta know what your cryptic filenames mean, because im betting you dont remember exactly what is what. Then you have the matter of handouts. Suddenly you need to keep a real folder too.
I just keep my folders well organized and often in the time it takes a person on a pc to find the right file, I can have it out as well.
I don't do handouts (not yet, anyway). I am a bad poet (not emo though, thank God) and try to be a good one; for that a lot of writing is needed. I have a very disorganized mind, which helps with getting ideas but not with keeping things coherent; with the program I am searching for it would be possible to have many different concepts and ideas and even just words visible at the same time, so it's easy to make connections.
My comp is on nearly all the time that I'm up, since I'm an unemployed recluse and rarely leave my apartment. (At least I'm true poet material...

)When I do venture outside, I carry paper all the time and use my cell phone as a mobile notepad.
Oh, then there's the fact that you gotta keep all that backed up, make sure you dont damage your hard drive, and for gods sakes, dont get your expensive piece of tech stolen. Who's going to jack a folder full of papers?
I do keep backups of all my files on a memorystick, although I admit to being careless and only copying them every few weeks or so.
2. Erase on a notepad is easy -- cross out the page, the line, the paragraph. When you're taking notes, you're not going to bother with actually erasing. As for writing -- well, it depends. I can write pretty fast and when Im writing on paper my ideas are much more freeflowing. I can take an idea and expand on it in the side margin, or easily go back to something I wrote earlier and add to it. Takes a lot longer on a computer without special software.
To the bolded: I don't really have to comment, do I?
Poems take a LOT of editing, believe me. I'd soon run out of paper. I've
no idea how the ancient poets did it... Without computers I'd be totally lost. Sure, I can start on paper and usually have a better 'flow' that way, as you put it; but I always continue on the comp.
I have zero patience (which is why I cannot even write good short stories), zero organising abilities. Right now I must have over 300 files full of fragments in my Writings-folder (not nearly all of them in use, mind you). Some large, some small; some coherent, most not at all. As for actual poems, I cannot say I've had much success. I write in Finnish so it would be hard for you to judge.
I have one further question for you: what happens when you run out of space in the marginal, or have no room to add something between sentences that desperately
needs to be there? Do you make a star* in the paper and continue on another piece of paper? 'Cause that's the path to
ultimate chaos for me. You
will lose that other paper, and you
cannot remember what was that brilliant sentence that was on it. Except ofc that it was Pulitzer material.

It's happened to me so many times; otherwise I'd already have won multiple awards.
(With the state of Finnish poetry these days I do have some real chances, although I must admit wasting 6 years on physics and chemisty etc certainly didn't help... Don't worry, you great rational minds; I am still searching for a day job, and I won't quit it right away even if I do get published.

)
@Warpus: AcidDraw was clearly drawn on acid since I didn't get anything that made any sense out of it... But if these Ansi/ascii things are the thing to search for, I'll run through a couple of 'em and see if anyone's any good.
