Which alignment or alignments based on the D&D Character Alignment system, are you?

[MajKira]

Chaotic NeutralChaotic Neutral is called the "Anarchist" or "Free Spirit" alignment. A character of this alignment is an individualist who follows his or her own heart, and generally shirks rules and traditions. Although they promote the ideals of freedom, it is their own freedom that comes first. Good and Evil come second to their need to be free, and the only reliable thing about them is how totally unreliable they are. Chaotic Neutral characters are free-spirited and do not enjoy the unnecessary suffering of others, but if they join a team, it is because that team's goals happen to coincide with their own at the moment. They invariably resent taking orders and can be very selfish in their pursuit of personal goals. A Chaotic Neutral character does not have to be an aimless wanderer; they may have a specific goal in mind, but their methods of achieving that goal are often disorganized, unorthodox, or entirely unpredictable.

A subset of Chaotic Neutral is: "strongly Chaotic Neutral"; describing a character who behaves chaotically to the point of appearing insane. Characters of this type may regularly change their appearance and attitudes for the sake of change and intentionally disrupt organizations for the sole reason of disrupting a lawful institution. Characters of this type include the Xaositects from the Planescape setting, and Hennet from the third edition Player's Handbook. In Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, Chaotic Neutral was mistakenly assumed to refer to this subset.

Captain Jack Sparrow, Al Swearengen from the TV series Deadwood, and Snake Plissken from Escape from New York are Chaotic Neutral characters according to Complete Scoundrel (3.5e).[9] Slaadi represent pure chaos outsiders.

Chaotic characters are superior in their own manner. Most lawful characters only take leadership if they are appointed by a majority who votes for them, whereas Chaotic characters have a strong will to take leadership out of their own will. So creating powers which are mostly opposed by the ruling system or several ruling systems who care for the majority/ common will of major peoples. Chaotic characters tend to tend their minor group to be best of all and all other opinions not fitting to it be to neglected.

 

[Evie]

That's more of a LN than a L thing, really.

LG won't need a vote, but it will need the situation to call for it, for the good of others. They won't naturally seek the leadership, and are arguably pretty close to that whole "Those who least want power are best suited to have it".

(That's true Lawful Good, eg Atticus Finch/Superman/etc, not 1st Ed Paladin Handbook Lawful Good Caricature eg Miko Miyazaki)

LE, on the other hand, will seek power. Not necessarily in a democratic way either. A coup that leave them with a sufficient veener of legitimacy, especially a coup against authorities that are themselves illegitimate, would be right up the LE character's alley. The law, to the LE character, is a tool to achieve their personal ambitions, and little more.

 

[Crezth]

Chaotic good!

 

[Borachio]

A chaotic good character acts as his conscience directs him with little regard for what others expect of him. He makes his own way, but he's kind and benevolent. He believes in goodness and right but has little use for laws and regulations. He hates it when people try to intimidate others and tell them what to do. He follows his own moral compass, which, although good, may not agree with that of society.

Chaotic good is the best alignment you can be because it combines a good heart with a free spirit.

Chaotic good can be a dangerous alignment when it disrupts the order of society and punishes those who do well for themselves.

Well, that kind of makes sense.

 

[kiwitt]

Neutral Good

 

[SamSniped]

Chaotic evil.

Never a truer statement has been made.
Anyway, I personally am Neutral Good leaning towards Neutral Neutral.