Which map size do you like best?

[Rohald]

usually huge but I play also others sizes. Now I m playing Scenarios then I think I ll do random, for playing 100% Conquest!

 

[Smokes]

Small or Normal. It already takes long enough just to play a small/normal map.

 

[Ladis McDadis]

Small
Archepeligo 80%

Fast Games to force use of navies, paratroops, bombers, carriers, etc.

And I agree, for myself, over 20 cities makes me bored.

--- Laddy

 

[Ian Beale]

140x140 or 180x180. I like having quite a lot of cities and quite a few different civs. It makes battles bigger and longer.

 

[RazorChain]

I like many others like huge maps, around 200x200 with 18 civs and tech slowdown, makes for an epic game that takes countless of hours I should be spending on something worthwhile Taken all the time I´ve spent on computer games I could probably built a Pyramid all by myself...yep think of that...population 1 in a grassland...how many turns does that make?

 

[tomart109]

I love large and huge, it makes exploration more fun (and important), and everything is more epic-sized...

Although i have to admit, moving a couple of hundred units per turn DOES get to be tedious...

 

[doolally]

-i've was playing on Tiny to get a feel for some of the new things that Conquests brings to the table. i recently moved up to Small. Normal just feels to unwieldy to me for a game i wanna finish in 2-4 sittings. actually, Tiny doesn't even feel as tiny as the smallest Alpha Centarui maps. can anyone confirm this? seems to me that conflicts happened much faster on the smallest AC maps.

-would be nice if we could select a few more civs for the small maps as well.

 

[Grey Fox]

Originally posted by doolally
-would be nice if we could select a few more civs for the small maps as well.

That you can change in the editor.

 

[Vancouver 2010]

Depends on the land shape. For Archipelago, I'll take Huge maps, but if I play a Pangaea map, I'll usually go for Standard or Small sized maps.