It's around 300 AD. Huge map, 16 civs. I'm a growing empire, 15 cities, equaling the biggest civs in the game that I know of.
The Greeks have just four cities and none are doing well. I suspect this is the result of a war they had with the Aztecs very early but I never actually saw cities change hands or any fighting, so I'm speculating.
However, the Greek cities, and the free land behind them, are all prime real estate for me eventually, once I've exhausted the available land.
Then, for no reason the Greeks declare war on me. Subsequent battles determine they have almost no defense and I easily take three of their four cities and then accept two techs, a worker, a much more complete world map and all their gold for peace. The whole thing was over in about 7 turns, most of that reaching their cities.
Yes, it was good for me, saved my rep a little because they declared and attacked first and I get the cities and access to the land I wanted, not to mention the settlement deal. But why would they do that? Doesn't the AI have any sense that they can't win a war?
The Greeks have just four cities and none are doing well. I suspect this is the result of a war they had with the Aztecs very early but I never actually saw cities change hands or any fighting, so I'm speculating.
However, the Greek cities, and the free land behind them, are all prime real estate for me eventually, once I've exhausted the available land.
Then, for no reason the Greeks declare war on me. Subsequent battles determine they have almost no defense and I easily take three of their four cities and then accept two techs, a worker, a much more complete world map and all their gold for peace. The whole thing was over in about 7 turns, most of that reaching their cities.
Yes, it was good for me, saved my rep a little because they declared and attacked first and I get the cities and access to the land I wanted, not to mention the settlement deal. But why would they do that? Doesn't the AI have any sense that they can't win a war?