Worst civ

[Fayadi]

RUBBBISH ABILITIES!!!!!!!!!!


Religious-Total rubbish complete uselessCompletely nuts whats the cow use of cheap temples?No anarch so what?Make sure u dont turn govt so easily

Expansionist-it is second worst,whats the use of early scouting ,u do have advantage early game,but mid - late game,this HAD NO EFFECT

Scientific-equals nothing too,extra 3 or 4 tech the whole game,no significant impact on mid-late game.Just faster tech.If u wanna go space race,this might be good,but money and military more important .either to destruct or construct faster


Great abilities
Industrious-Warning industrious is too good,it is a onesided ability ,faster worker for better empire.GREAT THROUGHOUT THE GAME

Commercial-Want to be a Millionarie?Choose Commercial!


So-so abilitiees

Military-It is good but industrious and Commercial is way above


I used to like Chinese in Civ 3(being nationalistic) now i think i like the French(So good the ability)....although the special unit sucks!

 

[tetley]

I agree Egyptians are a good civ, but their War Chariots are useless. By the time you get horses, you almost always have Horseback Riding already. Horsemen have the same stats as War Chariots, and both cost only one citizen to hurry out. I have yet to use a single War Chariot. One might argue that Chariots' 20-shield cost vs. Horsemen's 30-shields is superior, but that early in the game if you have a high-shield city you should be producing Wonders with it--not army units.

 

[homer]

I think we need a completely new set of civs.. maybe like the Hittites, the Assyrians, the cavemen... and any other races that were wiped off the face of the earth thru history... then we could end these political discussions about whose granpa raped whose daughter in a "red" indian (as opposed to ther colored indians) concentation camps run by the zulus back in the war of 1812.. and get back to talking about the civs in THE GAME!!!!!!

I have to say that religious civs (in the GAME) didnt really appeal to me... but now that Im playing a long game and seeing how much it sucks to go into anarchy for 7-10 turns.. the religious civs dont look too bad..

I do like the french (for the musketeer.. its a great time to go into the golden age... but I can get past the fact that I am playing the FRENCH.. yech!! (no offense to real French people)!!

 

[D.Shaffer]

For some reason, whenever I play the Egyptians on a normal map, I get an entire continent to myself. I dont need to explain why this is a good thing, do I?

The Aztecs are VERY nice on smaller maps. Their special unit might not seem like much, but they can cover a LOT of terrain and you can easilly gain a nice advantage by pumping out lots of Jaguar warriors due to the resultant golden age. 3-4 can take out a spearman without loss and you can cripple many civs by an early strike taking their settlers/workers and cities.

Religion is a VERY nice property BTW. Plop down a city and quick build a temple and then a cathedral and watch those border cities fall.

 

[Blackdragon]

: )



i was born with a snake in both of my fists whyle a hurricane was blowing............

bob dylan, jockerman