PimpyMicPimp
Regrets His Username.
I would be very disapointed if they left Civ 4 as it is now. Yes, Bhruic's patch fixes all the horrid bugs, but I'd have some serious issues with Firaxis if they left the official game in shambles like it is now.
Why? I just don't get it... if they give you the crap and someone fixes the crap, you get a good game in the end, right?
How much are you willing to pay for a game? If you want a completely bug free, extremely tested, gone through Q&A twenty times, etc, are you willing to pay $300 per copy for that game?
Why?? Bhruic's fixes everything important, just play with that.
I have to applaud Nintendo for holding their game writers to a high standard, and insisting that their customers really ARE deserving of a FINISHED product, even if it's only to protect their reputation. I don't own a single Nintendo product, because they don't build anything I want, but their reputation has penetrated even my thick skull. (I did enjoy playing my sister's NES when her kids asked me to play with them, though. Refreshing to not have the game crash just because I was winning a hard-fought victory, but the gameplay wasn't deep enough, nor the interface hardware sufficient for the games I like to play.)
after bhurics patch what do you think needs fixing?
Surely its not that hard to program the AI to find the strongest unit it has, find 3 (or 4) of them, and stick them in the army?
Obviously it is since it was never able to do so, and the whole concept was dropped in Civ 4.
Replaced, actually. With the crappy Warlord concept.
after bhurics patch what do you think needs fixing?
Obviously it is since it was never able to do so, and the whole concept was dropped in Civ 4.
Have you posted in the tech support forum?
Wodan