[RD] War in Gaza: News Thread

They'd probably have more of my sympathy if their objective wasn't the complete isolation of Israel as a nation. But I doubt very much the BDS membership sees much distinction between governmental and civil society there.
It's somewhat difficult when service in the IDF is mandatory (avoidance is punishable by imprisonment) and the education system every child goes through involves promoting the dehumanisation of Palestinians.

But I doubt people trying to gotcha BDS (which includes a whole range of Jewish folk) really understand how (unfortunately) entwined the military (and therefore government) are with the general population.
 
Chances of a ceasefire are apparently improving https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68920131.

I wonder if the US of A is putting more pressure on Israel given the protests at American universities and a coincidental decline in the number of potential Democrat votes.

I'm not surprised that many States in the US of A have laws forbidding disinvestment in Israel. What's not clear at the moment is whether these laws were passed as a result of pressure from the pro-Israeli lobby in the US of A.
 

Columbia students defy deadline to disband pro-Palestinian encampment​

New York City's Columbia University has begun suspending students involved in a pro-Palestinian protest on campus after they defied a deadline to disperse.

College leaders earlier warned those failing to disband from the two-week encampment by 14:00 EST (1800 GMT) on Monday would face disciplinary action.

But as the deadline passed, dozens of students rallied at the site.

Similar demonstrations have spawned across the US since police cleared another camp at Columbia this month.

Pressure on the leadership of the elite Ivy League university in Upper Manhattan has been building to act or step aside.

"What continues to transpire at Columbia is an utter disgrace," US House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "The campus is being overrun by antisemitic students and faculty alike."

"There must be consequences," the Louisiana Republican added, calling on the university's president, Nemat Shafik, to step down.

Earlier on Monday, a group of House Democrats urged Columbia's board of trustees to resign if it would not "act decisively, disband the encampment, and ensure the safety and security of all of its students".

"For the past week, this encampment has been the breeding ground for antisemitic attacks on Jewish students," the 21 lawmakers wrote. "The time for negotiation is over; the time for action is now."

The New York university has become the focal point of the country's debate over the war in Gaza and US support for Israel, as well as fears that antisemitism is putting Jewish students in danger.

On 18 April, police raided a pro-Palestinian encampment on the centre of campus and arrested more than 100 students.

But activists redoubled their efforts, regrouping into another encampment and prompting university leadership to move to hybrid learning.

Over the weekend, the university denied rumours of "an impending lockdown or evictions on campus" and told students it had no plans to bring back police "at this time".

On Monday morning, Dr Shafik said in a statement that "since Wednesday, a small group of academic leaders has been in constructive dialogues with student organizers to find a path that would result in the dismantling of the encampment".

"Regretfully, we were not able to come to an agreement," she said.

In a letter circulated to encampment organisers, the college warned it "will need to initiate disciplinary procedures because of a number of violations of university policies".

Students were instructed that if they voluntarily left the protest by 14:00 local time they would be allowed to complete their semesters.

Those who do not will be unable to finish the term and will be temporarily barred from campus, with those scheduled to graduate no longer eligible to do so, college authorities said.

Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, one of the main groups involved, vowed to defy the order in a post on X and called on activists to "protect the encampment".

"Do not sign anything with administration," the group wrote.

As the afternoon deadline came and went, the encampment - a cluster of tents on the Morningside campus - remained.

Student supporters gathered at and marched around the site, some banging drums and chanting: "Revolution!"

Many wore face coverings, telling the BBC they were worried about being recognised and facing recrimination - though the university wrote in its Monday letter that it had already identified several participants.

Guarding them at the entrance of the encampment was a human chain of staff and faculty members in orange-and-yellow vests, locking arms with each other to prevent entry.

Meanwhile, police seen carrying zip ties and setting up barricades on campus remained on standby, apparently without any orders to make arrests or attempt evictions.

In a media briefing, the university's vice-president of public affairs confirmed it had begun suspending students, partly to avoid any disruption to upcoming graduation ceremonies.

As Columbia administrators grapple with how to respond, the protest there has sparked similar demonstrations by students across the country.

The BBC is tracking protests or encampments on campuses in at least 22 other states and Washington DC.

Police moved in on Monday to dismantle an encampment at the University of Texas at Austin after officials said protesters had ignored directions to take down their tents.

The college said in a statement that "baseball size rocks" had been found in the encampment and the "majority of protesters are believed to be unaffiliated with the university".

Elsewhere, police at Virginia Tech arrested 91 people on trespassing charges on Sunday night, including 54 who are currently enrolled in the college.

Arrests were also made on Monday at the University of Georgia.

Many student protesters - who have called for a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war for months - are demanding the institutions they attend financially divest from any support for Israel.

In her statement on Monday, Dr Shafik said that while Columbia plans to explore a range of ideas to address student concerns, it "will not divest from Israel".

At the same time, amid alleged incidents of hate speech, harassment and threats of violence by some participants, Jewish students have voiced concern about their safety on campus.

"The world is watching as you continue to fail your Jewish students," congresswoman Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, said, as she accused Columbia of "empty threats and weak leadership".

Other Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, have highlighted antisemitic chants and incidents at the protests.

The White House is walking an increasingly fine line over the campus protests, seeking to balance the right to peaceful protest with condemnation of hateful speech.

"It is a painful moment, we get that," press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.

Declining to say how university leadership should act, she added: "Free expression has to be done within the law."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68923528
 
"For the past week, this encampment has been the breeding ground for antisemitic attacks on Jewish students," the 21 lawmakers wrote. "The time for negotiation is over; the time for action is now."

The New York university has become the focal point of the country's debate over the war in Gaza and US support for Israel, as well as fears that antisemitism is putting Jewish students in danger.
They keep on saying this, yet curiously fail to mention there are Jews among the protesters as well.

In fact one of the most remarkably ironic things to happen in the press coverage of student activism so far was when a journal interviewing Jews who 'feel threatened' by anti-Israel protesters quotes one as saying how isolated and betrayed he felt because some of his fellow Jews had joined the protests as well. Which raised the question as to why those Jews were not being interviewed as well, and why the media was so focused on the perspective of only Zionist Jews.
 
They keep on saying this, yet curiously fail to mention there are Jews among the protesters as well.

In fact one of the most remarkably ironic things to happen in the press coverage of student activism so far was when a journal interviewing Jews who 'feel threatened' by anti-Israel protesters quotes one as saying how isolated and betrayed he felt because some of his fellow Jews had joined the protests as well. Which raised the question as to why those Jews were not being interviewed as well, and why the media was so focused on the perspective of only Zionist Jews.

My favorite thing to have come out of all the media since October 7th was this story that ran in the Jewish Chronicle:

Others have set their preferences to Jewish on the mainstream apps, but this has come with its own challenges.

Zack, 35, says: “I got pretty disillusioned after I found myself consistently matching with anti-Zionists, even when I set it to ‘Jewish only’.”

Zack put an Israeli flag emoji on his profile to rectify the situation. “It’s annoying because the more creative personalities I normally go for tend to be more anti-Israel.” Now he’s having fewer awkward conversations about the conflict, but the people he’s matching with are “less interesting”.
 

Columbia students defy deadline to disband pro-Palestinian encampment​

New York City's Columbia University has begun suspending students involved in a pro-Palestinian protest on campus after they defied a deadline to disperse.

College leaders earlier warned those failing to disband from the two-week encampment by 14:00 EST (1800 GMT) on Monday would face disciplinary action.

But as the deadline passed, dozens of students rallied at the site.

Similar demonstrations have spawned across the US since police cleared another camp at Columbia this month.

Pressure on the leadership of the elite Ivy League university in Upper Manhattan has been building to act or step aside.

"What continues to transpire at Columbia is an utter disgrace," US House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "The campus is being overrun by antisemitic students and faculty alike."

"There must be consequences," the Louisiana Republican added, calling on the university's president, Nemat Shafik, to step down.

Earlier on Monday, a group of House Democrats urged Columbia's board of trustees to resign if it would not "act decisively, disband the encampment, and ensure the safety and security of all of its students".

"For the past week, this encampment has been the breeding ground for antisemitic attacks on Jewish students," the 21 lawmakers wrote. "The time for negotiation is over; the time for action is now."

The New York university has become the focal point of the country's debate over the war in Gaza and US support for Israel, as well as fears that antisemitism is putting Jewish students in danger.

On 18 April, police raided a pro-Palestinian encampment on the centre of campus and arrested more than 100 students.

But activists redoubled their efforts, regrouping into another encampment and prompting university leadership to move to hybrid learning.

Over the weekend, the university denied rumours of "an impending lockdown or evictions on campus" and told students it had no plans to bring back police "at this time".

On Monday morning, Dr Shafik said in a statement that "since Wednesday, a small group of academic leaders has been in constructive dialogues with student organizers to find a path that would result in the dismantling of the encampment".

"Regretfully, we were not able to come to an agreement," she said.

In a letter circulated to encampment organisers, the college warned it "will need to initiate disciplinary procedures because of a number of violations of university policies".

Students were instructed that if they voluntarily left the protest by 14:00 local time they would be allowed to complete their semesters.

Those who do not will be unable to finish the term and will be temporarily barred from campus, with those scheduled to graduate no longer eligible to do so, college authorities said.

Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, one of the main groups involved, vowed to defy the order in a post on X and called on activists to "protect the encampment".

"Do not sign anything with administration," the group wrote.

As the afternoon deadline came and went, the encampment - a cluster of tents on the Morningside campus - remained.

Student supporters gathered at and marched around the site, some banging drums and chanting: "Revolution!"

Many wore face coverings, telling the BBC they were worried about being recognised and facing recrimination - though the university wrote in its Monday letter that it had already identified several participants.

Guarding them at the entrance of the encampment was a human chain of staff and faculty members in orange-and-yellow vests, locking arms with each other to prevent entry.

Meanwhile, police seen carrying zip ties and setting up barricades on campus remained on standby, apparently without any orders to make arrests or attempt evictions.

In a media briefing, the university's vice-president of public affairs confirmed it had begun suspending students, partly to avoid any disruption to upcoming graduation ceremonies.

As Columbia administrators grapple with how to respond, the protest there has sparked similar demonstrations by students across the country.

The BBC is tracking protests or encampments on campuses in at least 22 other states and Washington DC.

Police moved in on Monday to dismantle an encampment at the University of Texas at Austin after officials said protesters had ignored directions to take down their tents.

The college said in a statement that "baseball size rocks" had been found in the encampment and the "majority of protesters are believed to be unaffiliated with the university".

Elsewhere, police at Virginia Tech arrested 91 people on trespassing charges on Sunday night, including 54 who are currently enrolled in the college.

Arrests were also made on Monday at the University of Georgia.

Many student protesters - who have called for a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war for months - are demanding the institutions they attend financially divest from any support for Israel.

In her statement on Monday, Dr Shafik said that while Columbia plans to explore a range of ideas to address student concerns, it "will not divest from Israel".

At the same time, amid alleged incidents of hate speech, harassment and threats of violence by some participants, Jewish students have voiced concern about their safety on campus.

"The world is watching as you continue to fail your Jewish students," congresswoman Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, said, as she accused Columbia of "empty threats and weak leadership".

Other Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, have highlighted antisemitic chants and incidents at the protests.

The White House is walking an increasingly fine line over the campus protests, seeking to balance the right to peaceful protest with condemnation of hateful speech.

"It is a painful moment, we get that," press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said.

Declining to say how university leadership should act, she added: "Free expression has to be done within the law."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68923528
This is never going to end well for administration, and that board of trustees is probably responsible for most of this behavior.
 

Everyone of the quotes is a banger, but this is perhaps the best:

“The only way for American Jews to feel safe is the knowledge that state power can be mobilized at a moment’s notice to systemically target a specific population.”
 

Ohio State University says it legally can't divest from Israel - here's the law behind that​

After a series of protests calling for Ohio State University to divest from Israel — which led to more than three dozen arrests this week — Ohio State University spokesperson Ben Johnson released a short statement Thursday night.

"Ohio Revised Code Section 9.76 prohibits the university from divesting any interests in Israel and prohibits adopting or adhering to a policy that requires divestment from Israel or with persons or entities associated with it," Johnson said in the statement.

Here's what you need to know about OSU's legal ability to divest:

What the law says about Ohio State divestment from Israel​

Johnson is referring to Ohio Revised Code (ORC) Section 9.76 — which was signed into law by then-Gov. John Kasich in 2016 and later amended in 2022 — which prohibits state agencies like universities from contracting with companies that are boycotting or disinvesting from Israel.

While this section of the law doesn't explicitly state that universities are prohibited from divesting from Israel, Ohio Attorney General's Office spokesperson Bethany McCorkle said the law has that effect anyway.

"The university cannot do itself what it is prohibited from doing through others. Allowing a wholesale boycott and divestiture by a university would circumvent the law and render it meaningless," she said.

The sponsor of the 2022 revision to ORC 9.76 that explicitly includes public universities as state agencies, Republican State Sen. Jerry Cirino, also said that section of the law prevents schools from divesting.

"The general intent is to make sure that we are accommodating to our allies and friends, strategically certainly, and we don't want things that are coming up today with these requests on our campuses that students are making, they may or may not be students, but protesters are asking for our universities to not do business with Israeli companies or companies in any way associated with Israel or those that are friendly to Israel. We just don't want to have that," Cirino said.

ORC 9.76, which received overwhelming bipartisan support in the Ohio legislature, has not been challenged in court.

While no Ohio universities have divested from Israel, they have divested or attempted to divest from other nations in the past.

Related Gaza protest article:Why are college students protesting? Ohio State, Miami University join Gaza protests

During apartheid, Ohio University divested $60,000 of its investments from South Africa in 1977, according to a 1982 report from the American Committee on Africa.

In 1978, Miami University's board of trustees voted to divest from corporations that do business in South Africa before reversing their decision after the state Attorney General warned them their action may violate state law, according to a June 1978 New York Times article.

There is no federal law prohibiting universities from divesting from Israel, although some have been proposed.

What is divestment?​

Divestment is the act of withdrawing investments in Israel, Israel-affiliated companies and other organizations that support Israel, according to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions website.

Divestment is one third of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement that calls for boycotting Israeli companies and international companies that support Israel, disinvesting from similar organizations, and for governments to issue economic sanctions on Israel.

Ohio is one of 38 states that have similar anti-BDS laws on the books, according to the Jewish Virtual Library.

The main target of OSU Divest, one of the groups spearheading this week's protests, is OSU's Office of Investments, which handles the school's endowments.

The OSU Office of Investments manages a long-term investment pool made up of endowments — which are donor gifts to the school — and university funds to "protect the financial health of the university and Wexner Medical Center," according to its website.

The office's investment strategy for these funds is "designed to produce steady growth over the long term while mitigating downside risk," according to its website.

More on Ohio State student protests:Ohio State faculty adviser: Student protest arrests show start of 'A wave of repression'

OSU Divest wants Ohio State's investment office to divest its investments in Israeli companies or companies that support Israel, according to its website.

In an email to OSU student newspaper The Lantern in March, OSU spokesperson Chris Booker clarified the role of the Office of Investments.

"Ohio State utilizes a diversified investment strategy to grow the resources available to support our academic mission, such as student scholarships, faculty positions and educational resources," Booker said.

"The university follows all applicable laws regarding investments, including state laws specifically addressing this issue. Ohio State's endowment is not funded with tuition or fees."
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news...-protests-hamas-war-osu-students/73466833007/
This is amazing.
 

Everyone of the quotes is a banger, but this is perhaps the best:
The irony.

Is this real ; by jew ?
So 'odd' I'm having trouble with it.
 
It is kind of funny to see someone worried about indiscriminate boycotts but not Israel's indiscriminate use of high explosives
Perhaps you are not familiar with how BDS works, at least in the broader sense? If a store owner has family in Israel he maybe sends money to , his customers get harassed until they don't go there anymore and the place closes. Because he "supports" Israel in toto. These three principles work in tandem. And they tend to go down some very dark places very quickly. I don't really support laws against it because it's still free speech, but I'm not particularly motivated by its underpinnings. I mean just insert "China" in its mission statement for a minute, and I'm quite certain you'd appreciate the sentiments against it.
 
It is law in 38 states with broad bi-partisan support.

I half expect the Supreme Court to "discover" that the founders actually intended to write "except if people are criticizing Israel" after every Constititional limit on state power, they just forgot to include that in the final draft

Perhaps you are not familiar with how BDS works, at least in the broader sense? If a store owner has family in Israel he maybe sends money to , his customers get harassed until they don't go there anymore and the place closes.

I am familiar with how boycotts work, yes

Because he "supports" Israel in toto. These three principles work in tandem. And they tend to go down some very dark places very quickly.

And that dark place is "I will not spend money when that money will ultimately be used to blow Palestinian children to smithereens"

I mean just insert "China" in its mission statement for a minute, and I'm quite certain you'd appreciate the sentiments against it.

I wouldn't oppose a similar boycott of Chinese goods tbh
 
It is law in 38 states with broad bi-partisan support.
We should be clear about this though, that support is just in congressional halls, the population is more 50/50 on it at best.
 
Republicans, including former President Trump, have been calling out reports of antisemitic chants, harassment and threats of violence at various campus protests.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has already called on Columbia's president Nemat Shafik to resign over her handling of the protests, is now going one step further.

"This is not a protest; this is terrorism," he wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

Republican congresswoman Elise Stefanik told reporters: "The university leadership has lost complete control. It is a disgrace and it is untenable."

“The world is watching as the leadership of our so-called elite colleges and universities continue to fail to condemn antisemitism and protect Jewish students on campus," the New York representative said.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-68924299?src_origin=BBCS_BBC
 

NYPD officers arrest Columbia protesters after school asks for help ending occupation​

Demonstrators dispute claims of 'outside agitators,' vow to keep pressure on university over ties to Israel

Police cleared 30 to 40 people from inside Columbia University's Hamilton Hall late Tuesday after pro-Palestinian protesters occupied the administration building on the New York campus earlier in the day.

NYPD officers acted after the school's president said there was no other way to ensure safety and restore order on campus and sought help from the department. The occupation of the building came as demonstrators spread out from an encampment elsewhere on the Ivy League school's grounds.

School officials asked law enforcement to stay on the Columbia campus through May 17, the end of the university's commencement events.

Columbia's protests began earlier this month and kicked off demonstrations that now span from California to Massachusetts. As May commencement ceremonies near, administrators face added pressure to clear protesters.

The scene unfolded shortly after 9 p.m. ET as police, wearing helmets and carrying zip ties and riot shields, massed at the Ivy League university's entrance. Officers breached Hamilton Hall, an administration building on campus that demonstrators had occupied more than 12 hours earlier, to clear out the structure.

The move came hours after NYPD brass said officers wouldn't enter the campus without the administration's request or an imminent emergency.

Columbia 'left with no choice'​

"After the university learned overnight that Hamilton Hall had been occupied, vandalized, and blockaded, we were left with no choice," the school's statement said, adding that school public safety personnel were forced out of the building and one facilities worker was "threatened."

"The decision to reach out to the NYPD was in response to the actions of the protesters, not the cause they are championing. We have made it clear that the life of campus cannot be endlessly interrupted by protesters who violate the rules and the law."

More than 1,000 protesters have been arrested over the last two weeks on campuses in states including Texas, Utah, Virginia, North Carolina, New Mexico, Connecticut, Louisiana, California and New Jersey — some after confrontations with police in riot gear.

In a letter to senior police officials, Columbia president Minouche Shafik asked that police remove protesters from the occupied building and a nearby tent encampment "with the utmost regret."

New York Mayor Eric Adams claimed Tuesday that the Columbia protests have been "co-opted by professional outside agitators."

The mayor didn't provide specific evidence to back up that contention, which was disputed by protest organizers and participants who oppose Israeli military action in Gaza and demand the school divest from companies they claim are profiting from the conflict.

Biden says occupying schools 'the wrong approach'​

The White House condemned the standoffs at Columbia and California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, where protesters had occupied two buildings until officers with batons intervened overnight and arrested 25 people. Officials estimated the Northern California campus's total damage to be upwards of $1 million US.

U.S. President Joe Biden said he believes students occupying an academic building is "absolutely the wrong approach," and "not an example of peaceful protest," said National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby.

Other colleges have sought to negotiate agreements with the demonstrators in the hopes of having peaceful commencement ceremonies.

As ceasefire negotiations appeared to gain steam, it wasn't clear whether those talks would lead to an easing of campus protests.

Northwestern University notched a rare win when officials said they reached a compromise with students and faculty who represent the majority of protesters on its campus near Chicago to allow peaceful demonstrations through the end of spring classes.

The nationwide campus protests began at Columbia in response to Israel's offensive in Gaza after Hamas launched a deadly attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7. Militants killed about 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and took roughly 250 hostages. Vowing to stamp out Hamas, Israel has killed more than 34,000 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, according to the local health ministry.

Israel and its supporters have branded the university protests as antisemitic, while Israel's critics say it uses those allegations to silence opposition.

Although some protesters have been caught on camera making antisemitic remarks or violent threats, organizers of the protests — some of whom are Jewish, say it is a peaceful movement aimed at defending Palestinian rights and protesting the war.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-campus-protests-columbia-building-1.7189020
 

Anyone with half a brain can tell this is how you chuck all negotiations out of the window. Why would Hamas release hostages if Israel is going to assault Rafah anyway? It's like Hamas saying deal or no deal they'll kill the hostages.

The West Bank-based Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said on Monday that an invasion of Rafah would be the "biggest catastrophe in the Palestinian people's history".

Now don't you be encouraging him

"The idea that we will halt the war before achieving all of its goals is out of the question," he said.

"We will enter Rafah and we will eliminate the Hamas battalions there with or without a deal, in order to achieve the total victory," according to a statement issued by Mr Netanyahu's office.

Sure you will. Israel couldn't eliminate Hamas battalions in the rest of Gaza where Hamas still occasionally ambushes IDF soldiers, but they'll surely eliminate this one? The IDF is capable only of causing mass devastation and innocent casualties, which was the plan all along.
 
Top Bottom