A axatin Prince Joined Jul 24, 2022 Messages 581 Oct 7, 2023 #21 APLion said: You should probably change title from "3-36a" to "6-36a" Click to expand... corrected, thank you
APLion said: You should probably change title from "3-36a" to "6-36a" Click to expand... corrected, thank you
Tekamthi Emperor Joined Aug 12, 2016 Messages 1,844 Oct 7, 2023 #22 added a counter-proposal, roughly conforming to ideas I've outlined in this thread: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/6-36c-save-the-elephants.685951/
added a counter-proposal, roughly conforming to ideas I've outlined in this thread: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/6-36c-save-the-elephants.685951/
InkAxis King Joined Feb 24, 2020 Messages 784 Oct 8, 2023 #23 I think war elephants are cool. Removing them is being overly focused on "balance" and "cleanness" to make the game boring. A resource can give benefits other than just yields. It's more interesting and provides strategic depth.
I think war elephants are cool. Removing them is being overly focused on "balance" and "cleanness" to make the game boring. A resource can give benefits other than just yields. It's more interesting and provides strategic depth.
A azum4roll Lost the game Joined Jul 17, 2018 Messages 4,712 Location Somewhere Oct 9, 2023 #24 CS does have a higher weight to give out CS-exclusive units.
A azum4roll Lost the game Joined Jul 17, 2018 Messages 4,712 Location Somewhere Oct 27, 2023 #25 I sponsor this.
Recursive Already Looping Moderator Supporter Joined Dec 19, 2017 Messages 6,221 Location Antarctica Jun 29, 2024 #26 Timestamp post to arrange all the threads in a neat order.