8.7 When AI builds stonehenge, the tiles it gains belong to me

Beelzibub

Chieftain
Joined
Nov 22, 2001
Messages
62
Location
England
Just started my first game with 8.7. I love the new concept for stonehenge. However India have just built it and all the tiles they have just gained around their capitol belong to me instead of them. It looks very strange on the map. they are DoF with me and at war with other 3 ai's
 
Also, when we build Stonehenge do you still want the 4th ring to be acquired cheaply? If you rush Stonehenge you can observe this very clearly where 4th ring tiles are added at the same rate 1st ring tile were.
 
@Beelzibub
Thanks for pointing out this bug, I hadn't tested what happened when an AI built it. I'll put out a hotfix asap.

@GoodRevrnd
That's an intended part of the benefit. The balancing thing is 4th ring tiles can't be worked by the city that builds Stonehenge - but could be useful for other cities, or if there's luxuries/strategics in the 4th ring. If it turns out to be too powerful I can adjust things accordingly. :)
 
Just started my first game with 8.7. I love the new concept for stonehenge. However India have just built it and all the tiles they have just gained around their capitol belong to me instead of them. It looks very strange on the map. they are DoF with me and at war with other 3 ai's

Russia just built it in my game and it granted me the tiles. The effect must grant the human the tiles, not the player that built the wonder.
 
It was just a problem with this line:

adjPlot:SetOwner(player, city:GetID())
|
v
adjPlot:SetOwner(player:GetID(), city:GetID())

The documentation said to use the player, but it actually uses the ID. :)
 
@GoodRevrnd
That's intended to be part of the benefit. The downside is those tiles can't be worked by the city that builds it - but could be useful for other cities, or if there's luxuries/strategics in the 4th ring. If it turns out to be too powerful I can adjust things accordingly. :)

I have no opinion regarding this mechanic at this time. Was just curious about intent.
 
Back
Top Bottom