Gingerbread Man
Dark Magus
Oh, stop thinking about backstabbing, lying, and dealing dirty this early on!
Early game is the worst time to wage war. Here is my proposal:
Non-Aggression Pact between the Gamecatcher Alliance & Fanatikou:
In the interests of peace and future cooperation, to ensure our security and friendship, the nations of Fanatikou and The Gamecatcher Alliance hereby agree to the following:
There shall be no war or conflict between us. Our units shall not attack each other. Nor shall our units interfere with the travel and movement of each other outside of these borders. This shall be considered a Non-Aggression Pact. CFC may send one warrior to explore, and GC may send one scout (or warrior If they cannot get scouts) ON THE CONDITION that the warrior/scouts will never be beyond sight from GC's borders.
This deal will be passed ONLY when the requested tech trade is made.
This agreement shall last 20 turns after it is ratified by both parties. This agreement shall be open for renegotiation after 15 turns have passed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And a message to all those who are demanding that we go to war, currently we have NO proof that it will benefit us, or that we will succeed. I ask that we dont backstab other teams until
a)we know that it would make us the most powerful nation,
b)that the backstabbee does not have any alliances, or at least very weak allies,
c)we will definitely succeed in the stabbing, and
d)our perceived reliability will not be damaged.
currently neither a, b, c, or d have been proven.
But lets say we want to go to war cleanly ('frontstabbing'). we must first
a)know that the enemy has something we need, or something we dont want them to have.
b)decide our objectives, exactly how we will acheive those
c)know when to stop, and what do we want of the enemy when they go begging for peace.
And for trade:
a)the deal will benefit us
b)the other team will accept our offer, that it isn't outrageous
c)the other team will not view us as demanding. They are less likely to trade that way
d)do not over-negotiate. The other teams will not want to trade, because they will find someone who gives a better deal.
e)Never demand too much when there may be other teams with what our trading friend wants.
Thats all I can think of for now.
Early game is the worst time to wage war. Here is my proposal:
Non-Aggression Pact between the Gamecatcher Alliance & Fanatikou:
In the interests of peace and future cooperation, to ensure our security and friendship, the nations of Fanatikou and The Gamecatcher Alliance hereby agree to the following:
There shall be no war or conflict between us. Our units shall not attack each other. Nor shall our units interfere with the travel and movement of each other outside of these borders. This shall be considered a Non-Aggression Pact. CFC may send one warrior to explore, and GC may send one scout (or warrior If they cannot get scouts) ON THE CONDITION that the warrior/scouts will never be beyond sight from GC's borders.
This deal will be passed ONLY when the requested tech trade is made.
This agreement shall last 20 turns after it is ratified by both parties. This agreement shall be open for renegotiation after 15 turns have passed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And a message to all those who are demanding that we go to war, currently we have NO proof that it will benefit us, or that we will succeed. I ask that we dont backstab other teams until
a)we know that it would make us the most powerful nation,
b)that the backstabbee does not have any alliances, or at least very weak allies,
c)we will definitely succeed in the stabbing, and
d)our perceived reliability will not be damaged.
currently neither a, b, c, or d have been proven.
But lets say we want to go to war cleanly ('frontstabbing'). we must first
a)know that the enemy has something we need, or something we dont want them to have.
b)decide our objectives, exactly how we will acheive those
c)know when to stop, and what do we want of the enemy when they go begging for peace.
And for trade:
a)the deal will benefit us
b)the other team will accept our offer, that it isn't outrageous
c)the other team will not view us as demanding. They are less likely to trade that way
d)do not over-negotiate. The other teams will not want to trade, because they will find someone who gives a better deal.
e)Never demand too much when there may be other teams with what our trading friend wants.
Thats all I can think of for now.