An entirely new perspective to consider

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
9,718
Do you all think things would be better if the North did not defeat the south (in the american civil war) thus allowing the south to keep slaves? I mean sure slavery is considered 'inhumane' by all these PC liberals but let's face it- Abraham Lincoln was more evil than Adolf Hitler because he taxed and temporarily increased the power of the federal government in a time of absolute emergency (let's not forget that the south had plans to eventually capture Washington D.C, so it was more than just a 'war of independence'

Here's another one. Do you think we should outlaw abortion just because certain religious perspectives say so even though our government explicitly states the separation of church and state? To be fair, some Christians did some good things like the C.I.A (both the central intelligence agency and christians in action), and plus the majority of Americans have vague Christian roots, so clearly it's their way or the highway.

Should we vote for Ron Paul? I for one think we should, even though 1) he's retired and wouldn't want to be president anymore anyway and 2) his economic policies would make America's income gap between the wealthy and poor much larger than it already is. The reason for this is because I believe in freedom, and anyone else is a nazi that hates LIBERTY.
 
"I mean sure slavery is considered 'inhumane' by all these PC liberals."

What.
 
7/10.
 
"I mean sure slavery is considered 'inhumane' by all these PC liberals."

What.

I'm asserting that slavery isn't all that bad. The reason for this is because slaves (the slaves themselves, that is) didn't have to pay taxes.
 
You believe in freedom, but you are pro-slavery? I take it the freedom is for YOU, and the slavery is for other people... yes?

I'm asserting that slavery isn't all that bad. The reason for this is because slaves (the slaves themselves, that is) didn't have to pay taxes.

Neither do dead people. Are you pro-murder as well?
 
How synchronistic, although I don't like the title that much given the multiple perspectives being presented.

In the assumption that sock puppetry is at a low tide. Let's take that abortion issue. If a religious organization wants to restrict membership due to adherence to religious beliefs, why would that necessitate a ban at the state level? The organizations can exist with intentionally abortionless members, and everyone else will eventually go to hell anyways, right?
 
You believe in freedom, but you are pro-slavery? I take it the freedom is for YOU, and the slavery is for other people... yes?

A truly free market would have slaves. If you oppose the existence of slaves you oppose the free market itself, thus making you a nazi freedom hater. Plus, some of the slaves were treated 'well'.
 
Neither do dead people. Are you pro-murder as well?

Depends on what you mean by that term. Abortion is murder, but the death penalty is not.
 
I'm asserting that slavery isn't all that bad. The reason for this is because slaves (the slaves themselves, that is) didn't have to pay taxes.

They also didn't have to have the burden of free will and self-fulfillment. Really, everyone besides you should be slaves. You're taking one for the team, right?
 
They also didn't have to have the burden of free will and self-fulfillment. Really, everyone besides you should be slaves. You're taking one for the team, right?

No. The slaves have no taxes and responsibilities besides doing what master says. And plus, if they deserved to be the master, they would be by default. That's just the way the free market works.

Now all I have left are these lame B.D.S.M contracts. Oh well.
 
I have no idea what you NAZIS are talking about. I'm trying to spread freedom across the world.
 
There's some higher order trolling going on here. Although I doubt the OP is consciously aware of it.

You have no idea what I'm aware of.
 
Quite possibly so. It's what you're not aware of that worries me.:faint:

I'm not aware of any perspective other than what Ron Paul wants me to think. The reason for this is because he is a divine authority that can't be questioned.

edit: That said, even though Ron Paul is not in the holy trinity he is still a divine authority that must be worshiped. On the other hand, a Christian that dares accept homosexuals as human beings believe in a false god.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom