And finally, my closing argument of the issue. I am so glad that you publicly stated that you will further your morally bankrupt invasion to destroy me. It will make your eventual humiliation in public much more satisfying to me.
OOC: I do believe that to mimic the game's behavior, that my proclamation was and is a valid action. Given that Wildfire has seen fit to reply (something the game would not let him do), I shall now point out why his actions should still be condemned. I have no intention of participating in a drawn out mud-slinging contest. those of you who are offended by my in character writings are invited to email me, and I will take care to not cc you any more of these missives.
My Fellow Despots:
It is with great regret that I now realize that my earlier proclamation has caused to the odious chore of listening to the bleatings of the Persian blackguard. However distasteful the task of reading his bleatings must have been, I beseech you to see the facts underlying his statements.
1. Any communications with a former ruler cannot in any w ay be valid in his defense, as there has never been any communication with the previous regime. They were all beheaded before I arrived. Please ignore his shallow attempt at obfuscation.
2. Hmmm. How far does a warrior on flat terrain see? Wildfire the Perfidious willfully violated my borders to get next to the city of Boston in order to see that it was vacant. If the Persian perpetuates this lie, I will be happy to post a map shot of the area to prove beyond doubt his untruthfulness. Whether dyes were or were not present is irrelevant. Nonetheless, the cad admits that he attacked during a time of peace treaty. Why would he violate my territory, and then sneak attack three seasons into a peace treaty he requested? Because he's an untrustworthy thug, that's why.
3. As for the second city, and Wildfire the Putrid's meager excuse that we were already at war, this is also a poor argument. Since the first attack was unjustified, the second was fruit of that poisonous tree.
4. Wildfire the Perfidious claims that the war is my fault, because I did not defend a city deep in my territory after a peace treaty was put in force. This is like blaming a homeowner for a burglary because he neglected to lock his door, rather than blaming the burglar who perpetrated the crime. The argument is not valid. The foul-smelling Persian blames America for this war because he claim's we need an army to back up our words. All civil men should disagree with this. An honorable man's word is his bond. A dagger clenched tightly behind the back while words of peace are spoken is the mark of of a dishonorable cutthroat.
Once again, I call for condemnation and ostracization of the evil Persian and his feeble empire.
Playboy
For the Americans
OOC: I do believe that to mimic the game's behavior, that my proclamation was and is a valid action. Given that Wildfire has seen fit to reply (something the game would not let him do), I shall now point out why his actions should still be condemned. I have no intention of participating in a drawn out mud-slinging contest. those of you who are offended by my in character writings are invited to email me, and I will take care to not cc you any more of these missives.
My Fellow Despots:
It is with great regret that I now realize that my earlier proclamation has caused to the odious chore of listening to the bleatings of the Persian blackguard. However distasteful the task of reading his bleatings must have been, I beseech you to see the facts underlying his statements.
1. Any communications with a former ruler cannot in any w ay be valid in his defense, as there has never been any communication with the previous regime. They were all beheaded before I arrived. Please ignore his shallow attempt at obfuscation.
2. Hmmm. How far does a warrior on flat terrain see? Wildfire the Perfidious willfully violated my borders to get next to the city of Boston in order to see that it was vacant. If the Persian perpetuates this lie, I will be happy to post a map shot of the area to prove beyond doubt his untruthfulness. Whether dyes were or were not present is irrelevant. Nonetheless, the cad admits that he attacked during a time of peace treaty. Why would he violate my territory, and then sneak attack three seasons into a peace treaty he requested? Because he's an untrustworthy thug, that's why.
3. As for the second city, and Wildfire the Putrid's meager excuse that we were already at war, this is also a poor argument. Since the first attack was unjustified, the second was fruit of that poisonous tree.
4. Wildfire the Perfidious claims that the war is my fault, because I did not defend a city deep in my territory after a peace treaty was put in force. This is like blaming a homeowner for a burglary because he neglected to lock his door, rather than blaming the burglar who perpetrated the crime. The argument is not valid. The foul-smelling Persian blames America for this war because he claim's we need an army to back up our words. All civil men should disagree with this. An honorable man's word is his bond. A dagger clenched tightly behind the back while words of peace are spoken is the mark of of a dishonorable cutthroat.
Once again, I call for condemnation and ostracization of the evil Persian and his feeble empire.
Playboy
For the Americans
:love2::rocket2:
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
