Another Cold Rehash, er The Last Jedi, for those who have seen it (SPOILERS).

What does this mean, then, so as to avoid putting words in your mouth? Does each part of the movie need to stand on its own, apart from the greater context?
Kind of the opposite. For the most part the individual scenes are fine on their own. Taken as a whole it mostly sucked.

It's like an exam where there are a few A's earned by the class but the average is a D.
 
"Mostly sucked" as in, you found it unsatisfying? Nonsensical? Not what you expected/wanted out of it?

Clearly stated objective,

Deactivate the tracker.

measurable progress toward that objective,

Maz says go to casino, find this guy. We went to the casino and found the guy.

obstacles,

We're in jail.

obstacles overcome,

Guy in our cell can help us deactivate the tracker, he gets us into the room the tracker is in.

resolution of objective.

Well, no, didn't quite make it this far. The old double-cross, made all the better by the fact that it was rather unexpected (by me, at least).

Was it a tight, perfect sequence? No, not really. But it hit all the beats right up until the plan failed.
 
We went to the casino and found the guy.

You didn't find the guy; you found some other guy.

We're in jail.

No you're not, because you're in jail with a guy who can break you out of jail, and who has just been himself taking a nap in jail until you show up to be broke out.
 
You didn't find the guy; you found some other guy.

They did find the guy. They got tossed in a cell before they could approach him, but they found him as directed. That thing which got in the way of approaching the guy is known in the parlance of our times as an "obstacle."

No you're not, because you're in jail with a guy who can break you out of jail, and who has just been himself taking a nap in jail until you show up to be broke out.

You don't know that initially. You also don't know how trustworthy or capable this person is, but are left without other options by that point.

You also need to get from the jail cell back to the ship. Which requires overcoming such obstacles as: there are guards outside our cell, the cops blew up our escape pod, the cops are chasing us, etc. Getting tossed in jail, even accounting for the providence of having an approximation of the guy (which who knows, maybe he was "the guy" all along?), brings with it its own not insignificant set of obstacles. That they overcame by stampeding cattle (that's not much of a crime. Through the Vatican? Kinky!).
 
Last edited:
Po: “Did you find the guy?”
Finn: “We found a guy.”
 
There was a literal scene of them making eye contact with the intended target before being jailed. Hating the Canto sub-plot is fine but it doesn't really make sense if it relies on you going "Dunno, didn't happen" to all of the scenes that contradict your viewpoint.
 
Check the imdb:

“JD” is played by Benicio del Toro
“Master Codebreaker” is played by Justin Theroux

Again: “We found a guy”
 
No. There is no plausible scenario where rust buckets that are falling apart and are trapped on the ground will win against ground attacking star fighters. It was stupid and you're gushing over it which was exactly the point I was making. I'm sure they will make a really interesting entry in one of the cross-sectional technical manuals but outside that they were dumb. I'm not discounting the technical manuals either, those are really interesting to me. I had several and wore them out growing up and would definitely read one for this movie. But the salt skimmers were still stupid death traps.
I know you already conceded that "winning" wasn't the point... but then you seem to dismiss that detail and go back to arguing that using the speeders was derpy because they couldn't win (ie they had "no chance" against fighters)... What I think you are missing, is that was the point ... as in, it was a desperation move. They were literally backed into a corner with seemingly no alternative... so Poe, in typical Poe fashion throughout the film says "Let's hop in some fighters and do something cause its gonna work cause we're the good guys." But then, when they are hallway to the target, his guys start getting shot down like flies, precisely because, as you astutely point out... they had no chance against the forces they were facing... Poe, having grown as a leader over the course of the film, looks to his left and right and makes the call he was unable/unwilling to make in the opening battle... he realizes that they are getting slaughtered and orders them to retreat. Remember his refusal to do exactly this is why Leia demotes him and why Holdor does not trust him. The whole movie is setting up Poe finally being able to make this call.

Same thing for Finn, but he is further behind in his progression than Poe. Old Finn, TFA Finn would have argued to high heaven exactly what you say... "We have no chance against these odds we need to take these speeders and run or hide in the catacombs... anything but facing off against the F.O." which he has always been terrified of... but precisely because of his experience on the Cato Bight missions, he has a different attitude now. He now feels that evil must be confronted and defeated at any cost, even his own life. So he is all-in for the suicide attack on the laZer (take that @Takhisis :p) cannon. This is a new Finn... a "never give up, never surrender" Finn that we didn't have before... and we have the "pointless" Casino mission to thank for it. Also note that even after Rose saves him Finn is ready to charge right back out there on foot to stand with Luke against the AT-ATs, because he wants to fight them to the death no matter the odds... but because Poe has grown as a leader, he is wise enough to see that this is their chance to escape and that their survival/retreat is the plan... something that old Poe was unable to see when he led the mutiny. This is a new Poe... a "live to fight another day" Poe that we didn't have before... and again, we have the "pointless" Casino mission to thank for it.
The storytelling felt to me disjointed, muddy, frenetic, unsequential.
When I watched it the first time (in 3D-IMAX), my feeling coming out of the theatre was exactly that it was frenetic... I felt like the story was moving so fast and there was so much going on... non-stop action... like I had just gotten off a roller-coaster. It wasn't even until hours later that I began reflecting on Finn's arc and at first blush, upon reflection, it seemed like... as many have said it had no impact on the story... but then I started thinking more about it and I realized that it actually was the whole lynchpin of the story... Anyway, when I went to see it again (non 3D) I realized that the First and Third parts of the movie are actually the ones that are action-packed... while the Second act (where the Canto Bight scenes occur) is actually a much more thoughtful, deliberate, dialogue and plot-heavy part of the film... there's a lot of analysis and stuff to unpack in the Second act, and so I think that its no coincidence that the Second Act receives the most complaints.
What I experienced instead was muddy story telling. I'm searching for a guy with a certain insignia, I'm marked by security guards, but I take a little time to watch a horse race through binoculars, I do get arrested but a guy who can break me out and take the place of my objective falls in my lap, and so do some cute creatures who can spirit me away. It's all fits and starts, no progression. No progression driven by characters and their personalities interacting with other characters and their personalities.
You didn't find the guy; you found some other guy. No you're not, because you're in jail with a guy who can break you out of jail, and who has just been himself taking a nap in jail until you show up to be broke out.
About that... When I watched it the first time, as I've sad, I missed the Maz scene, so I was at a disadvantage trying to unpack that aspect... But when I watched it again, I saw the Maz scene... and something jumped out at me. Maz strongly implies that she has a romantic relationship with the master codebreaker. Now we know that the guy who is wearing the red lapel pin is not really her type, whereas the guy in the cell (DJ/Del Toro) is. I say this because she explicitly states in TFA that she is attracted to Chewbacca. She likes fuzzy, scruffy, pirate-types, like Chewy... and by implication DJ... not smooth clean-cut fancy pantses like the guy we see with the pin on. So I am thinking that the movie pulled a fast one on us and that DJ is the codebreaker, but he was thrown in the cell, possibly because the guy in the casino stole his pin, and got him arrested somehow. DJ shows that he is basically good natured towards them and only betrays them because he has no choice. Do you think its possible that Maz alerted him ahead of time to be on the lookout for her friends and so he is actually expecting them? Just spit-balling here, but it seems odd that they would put in that bit with Maz gushing over the guy for no reason. I agree that there being two master codebreakers in the same place, particularly one just happening to be in the cell that they get thrown into seems to be a very deus ex machiney coincidence... but if DJ actually is the guy Maz sent them to meet, then it makes more sense no?
 
Last edited:
So, someone who understood it, just walk me through how I'm supposed to have processed the Canto Bight plot. Here's the sequence, as I experienced it:

1) Our wise woman tells us, "You need a master codebreaker. Find the guy with the red insignia"
2) We get to the casino and the film makes a point of us marking the guy with the red insignia
3) We get thrown in prison and meet a guy who is also a codebreaker
4) We settle for him instead.

Is it "We couldn't acquire the intended target, so we just settled for the best we could get"? Well, even if that's the answer, then there's the bizarre coincidence that on Canto Bight on that day is a master codebreaker and a good-enough substitute, and we just happened to get imprisoned in the cell with the good-enough substitute.

When I watched it the first time

but then I started thinking more about it

Like I've said you have picked a plausible set of meanings out of the flurry of details that the film provided us. Good on you. (And thank you for sharing b/c you've done as much as anyone to give me a way to rewatch the movie). But it's a director's job to make sure that viewers get a coherent plot while they're watching, not with extensive retrospective musings.

Or do I have to go into my Faulkner and Woolf mode when I watch this damn thing? Certain 20th c novelists ask you to pick a plot out of a set of surface-disconnected details. Is that how I'm to watch Star Wars movies now?

And even you, my Master Codebreaker, the best you can do is:
Just spit-balling here

Honestly? You read a romantic attachment out of that Skype where Maz was giving a mission while lurching around shooting enemies?

And do we really know Maz's romantic "type" from that scene we saw her in in TFA? And we're supposed to remember it for a key plot development in this movie? Man, you're a sharper movie watcher than me!
 
Last edited:
Yeah, we really could have used a guy like sommerswerd in our "ring of knowledge" back in my college days ;)
 
You read a romantic attachment out of that Skype where Maz was giving a mission while lurching around shooting enemies?
IIRC, she is talking about all the things he is good at, including being a codebreaker and a pilot... but then she put on her best Eartha Kitt voice and purrs/sighs that he is good at "many things" or something along those lines... it wasn't subtle. She's into the dude and she's been with him in that way. And like you said... the fact that she mentions it while in an active firefight is a hard-signal to me that its an important piece of info. I could be wrong of course, but it makes the seemingly way too convenient coincidence much less coincidental. So go with me on this... if there's only one codebreaker, Del Toro, and the other guy (with the pin) is actually some kind of decoy or identity thief... does the scene make more sense? Like say for example that JD knows that Maz's friends are coming, but he doesn't know them from Adam and doesn't trust them, or want to expose himself to them, so he places the lapel pin on someone else and watches to see who takes the bait... but then before he can approach they get arrested... so knowing they are going to get thrown into the first empty cell available, he breaks in ahead of time, hides in the shadows and is waiting like 2 minutes for them to arrive... then promptly rescues them and gets them off the planet because that was precisely what he was there to do. He never gives them his true identity, because he never fully trusts them, and this way he doesn't make his business bad with Maz, because for all she knows, they never met up with him. Now if you and @Takhisis want to make a bet on that... I'm game. JD is more than he appears to be, and his role will be explained further in the next film... says I.
Or do I have to go into my Faulkner and Woolf mode when I watch this damn thing? Certain 20th c novelists ask you to pick a plot out of a set of surface-disconnected details. Is that how I'm to watch Star Wars movies now? ... Man, you're a sharper movie watcher than me!
Well, no, I'm just your friendly neighborhood Star Wars nerd...

But since you mention it... there's a reason this movie has a Rotten Tomatoes 90+ rating with movie critics, while having a 50s rating with rank and file audience raters. Like I said before I even saw the movie... in my experience, when you see that on Rotten Tomatoes... critics raving and audiences ranting... its almost always because the movie has a lot more to analyze and not as much straightforward entertainment as what folks wanted/expected. I didn't think that was what was going on with this movie... but after seeing it again, its clear that this is exactly what is going on.
Yeah, we really could have used a guy like sommerswerd in our "ring of knowledge" back in my college days ;)
And I swung a mean Magic to boot ... Urza's mine+ power plant + tower + Fireball FTW ;)
 
Last edited:
So go with me on this... if there's only one codebreaker, Del Toro, and the other guy (with the pin) is actually some kind of decoy or identity thief... does the scene make more sense? Like say for example that JD knows that Maz's friends are coming, but he doesn't know them from Adam and doesn't trust them, or want to expose himself to them, so he places the lapel pin on someone else and watches to see who takes the bait... but then before he can approach they get arrested... so knowing they are going to get thrown into the first empty cell available, he breaks in ahead of time, hides in the shadows and is waiting like 2 minutes for them to arrive... then promptly rescues them and gets them off the planet because that was precisely what he was there to do. He never gives them his true identity, because he never fully trusts them, and this way he doesn't make his business bad with Maz, because for all she knows, they never met up with him.

DJ

I'm perfectly happy to "go with you" because this elaborate hypothesis provides a way of making sense of the sequence of actions dramatized.

Too bad the movie didn't do so!

(I don't know whether Owen's spot--the cast list calling the other guy Master Codebreaker--does to your theory, In your scenario, shouldn't Theroux then be listed as "Master Codebreaker" (scare quotes)?)

Now I remember Maz's purr, okay. As the mission is laid out for them, is the codebreaker supposed to know they are coming? Like, one thing I couldn't figure was what they were supposed to do once they found the guy. Convince him to aid them? "Hi swanky rich gambler guy, we're two unwashed and desperate Resistance members; would you like to fly onto a FO drednaught with us and disable one of their codes? C'mon, it'll be a hoot."

If he's a good guy, standing by willing to help them, why can't Maz just vouch for Finn and Rose? Why do they need to go to him?

JD is more than he appears to be, and his role will be explained further in the next film... says I.

I've predicted he'll be the Lando Calrissian of this series.
 
Last edited:
Ah dude, that's right. I forgot about that "many things" part. I was creeped out a little by the way she said that, but yeah. Maz is NOT heaping praise at the bedroom skillz of some foo-foo high society type in polished boots and puffy pants. Also, come on it's STAR WARS, that is SO TOTALLY not any guy who is useful for anything, ever.

I'm now 100% convinced, DJ was "the guy" all along. I'm all but certain, too, that she said, "find the man in the red" whatever it was, or "look for," and not "the codebreaker is the man with the red" thing. And it's more easily explained by, "Maz has the force and could see they'd get locked up together, because red lapel pin throws all the street trash in the same cell," or some such. It needn't be so complicated.
 
"Maz has the force and could see they'd get locked up together, because red lapel pin throws all the street trash in the same cell,"
That's complicated, actually.

I just mean, it's a lot of personality to import into a guy that the film actually tells us nothing about, really just lets us glimpse one time.
 
You don't even need that second part. "Maz saw they'd get thrown into DJ's cell." The why is secondary.

Heck, DJ has the ability to put himself there, so maybe he just laid there and waited for them. Was never arrested at all. That would explain why he still had all his rogue's tools on him. He doesn't have to worry about it, because he can move between cells freely. But hey look, no need, cops tossed them in with me!
 
The best Star Wars minds in the galaxy have spent a week spitballing about how one of the plotlines in TLJ is supposed to be understood . . . made their way to a "so maybe" . . .

and I'm supposed to regard this as possibly the best Star Wars movie of all time!
 
(I don't know whether Owen's spot--the cast list calling the other guy Master Codebreaker--does to your theory, In your scenario, shouldn't Theroux then be listed as "Master Codebreaker" (scare quotes)?)
First and most importantly... is it "JD" or "DJ"? I'm going with "DJ" from now on, until someone authoritatively tells me otherwise... Secondly, no... The Don-Juan in the tux would be properly listed as "Master Codebreaker" without scare quotes, because that is who Finn and Rose think he is, and that is who we are intended to think he is until the big reveal in the next movie that DJ is actually the codebreaker and tux-guy was a red herring. As you say, I'm thinking shades of Lando... ala, he is a scoundrel with a heart of gold... and Maz's boyfriend. I'm thinking maybe Finn and Rose "tell on him" for betraying them and Maz smacks him in the back of the head "You never told me that!" or something along those lines...
Now I remember Maz's purr, okay. As the mission is laid out for them, is the codebreaker supposed to know they are coming? Like, one thing I couldn't figure was what they were supposed to do once they found the guy. Convince him to aid them? "Hi swanky rich gambler guy, we're two unwashed and desperate Resistance members; would you like to fly onto a FO drednaught with us and disable one of their codes? C'mon, it'll be a hoot." If he's a good guy, standing by willing to help them, why can't Maz just vouch for Finn and Rose? Why do they need to go to him?
As for the first question... I don't know... One of my theories is that he is expecting them and uses the pin as a decoy to spot them without them spotting him. They are wanted by the F.O. after all, and he is obviously not an upstanding law abiding citizen either, so it makes sense that he would want to be as discrete as possible. As for your second point, I agree... when I saw the guy with the pin, my reaction was like "WTH? How are they gonna convince that guy to leave his winnings and his lady friends and go off on the mission with them?" The only way it makes sense is if he knew in advance from Maz and would do something like that on her say-so.

Which brings up another thing... when Finn and Rose get arrested, the guy with the red pin and tux seems to notice... and his arm candy does as well. She tries to draw his attention to them, and he very deliberately dismisses her concerns... almost like them getting arrested was what he expected to happen. It seems like that is significant for some reason, otherwise why specifically show that?... Tux-guy seeing them getting arrested and not seeming to be concerned with it, while his date is clearly distressed by it. When I first saw it I chalked it up to him being a rich prick who couldn't be bothered to look up from his game/money, but on second viewing, and seeing the Maz scene, I am now thinking there may be more to it. Maybe the other guy knew he was a decoy for DJ? I don't know, obviously, but I share your feeling that DJ is going to be back in the next film as a born again good-guy. So to answer your 3rd question... I think Maz already vouched for them, which is why he doesn't extort Rose's pendant, and why he swings back to save them from the field despite having seemingly no incentive to do so. Another detail I noticed on the second viewing, is that Phasma specifically refers to the arms dealer's vessel they "stole" as "Your ship", the "your" referring to DJ. So maybe he is a member of the crew, or a passenger and he is only pretending to steal it to keep his identity hidden. If he doesn't have his own ship, maybe that would explain why they needed to go to him. He needed a ride. Also even assuming it is actually his ship, it would kind of be a bit much for Maz to ask her friend to fly to an active battle/chase where active laser fire is being exchanged, dock with the ship being chased, pick up passengers and then disembark and head full speed into a barrage of cannon fire at the F.O. dreadnought to attempt to "sneak" onto the ship, right? I mean clearly you just came from that resistance ship, so we're going to blast you to smithereens, right?
The best Star Wars minds in the galaxy have spent a week spitballing about how one of the plotlines in TLJ is supposed to be understood . . . made their way to a "so maybe" . . .

and I'm supposed to regard this as possibly the best Star Wars movie of all time!
Every word of this sentence is wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom