The A Palace is obseleted by the tech that the UN is enabled. So yes, it should stop working. And the reason why it didn't pass is because not enough people voted for it.
First, you should keep your questions to one thread.
Mass Media obsoletes the AP, if I remember correctly.
I don't know why that regulation failed - perhaps it's because someone voted Never?
^The secretary General. He's the head hancho and he defied the resolution.
If it worked like that no one would ever defy a vote, because there are only penalties to doing so and no benefits over just voting no.
Defying should still make it not apply to you.
However it does make sense, in some sense that Defying it would stop it.
Palpster said:If it worked like that no one would ever defy a vote, because there are only penalties to doing so and no benefits over just voting no.
No, if you vote just "no" and the resolution passes you MUST follow the resolution.If it worked like that no one would ever defy a vote, because there are only penalties to doing so and no benefits over just voting no.
No, the benefit would be the freedom to do as you like. Say if the UN bans nukes, you could defy it and be the only nuclear power, albeit a hated one. Say the UN is trying to force you to end a beneficial war. This would allow you to keep going.
That is the logical way for the UN to work rather than the current veto system.