Morningcalm
Keeper of Records
I must disagree, I don't really like Civ V much at all (especially compared to the awesomely complex and atmospheric Civ IV). BUT I find the scenarios in the Civ V DLC packs are much more fun than the actual game itself (lol), partly because they're so much more challenging, especially on the higher levels. 1066 was fun because it's consumed by military tactics, and on higher levels it's a real nail-biter to see if you can get all the Courts constructed in time. The Vikings are hardly menacing in that scenario, but they do tend to take key cities. It is quite tough as Normandy to win though, or at least, I found it to be.Windsor said:Well, you got Khan for free. Do you think he added much? Love that scenario? Probably not. In that case DLC is simply not worth it. Not at all. The game is still the same boring game. More civs, maps and scenarios doesn't change that.
DLC is for people who really like the game.
I dislike how the Genghis Khan scenario had Gandhi with glasses in (blergh laziness), but as far as the actual mission, I did like it, though it was truly frustrating and I've yet to beat it on Emperor...the time limit is absolutely nuts. And I love that.
Just my 2 cents.