Countmonte8242
Warlord
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2005
- Messages
- 191
I'm probably going back to Civ IV myself, might even throw some Civ 2 into the mix cause that was such a great game and I haven't played it in like 10 years.
I wanted to love 5, I gave it a couple weeks of good playing, had some fun at times. But the bottom line to me is that most of the radical new changes made the game less fun than its predecessors. Expansion in Civ 5 is much less fun than in any version, too much of an artificial check on it. Global happiness sucks as is, and is the main reason for the previously mentioned problem. 1 UPT makes troop movement tedious on your end and slows down NPC turns many times over from the extra calculations 1 UPT requires. Great people are more one dimensional, bonus resources are boring, the gold economy is terribly balanced and a poor replacement for the good old tech slider. The graphics are soulless, and considering the requirements are an absolute waste of gpu power and memory. I could go on, but why bother. I'm over it, I've accepted that Civ 5 is easily the least fun game to come along in the series.
I wanted to love 5, I gave it a couple weeks of good playing, had some fun at times. But the bottom line to me is that most of the radical new changes made the game less fun than its predecessors. Expansion in Civ 5 is much less fun than in any version, too much of an artificial check on it. Global happiness sucks as is, and is the main reason for the previously mentioned problem. 1 UPT makes troop movement tedious on your end and slows down NPC turns many times over from the extra calculations 1 UPT requires. Great people are more one dimensional, bonus resources are boring, the gold economy is terribly balanced and a poor replacement for the good old tech slider. The graphics are soulless, and considering the requirements are an absolute waste of gpu power and memory. I could go on, but why bother. I'm over it, I've accepted that Civ 5 is easily the least fun game to come along in the series.