Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rathaus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rathaus
wow i's make a poor joke and y'all jump on me like i was an ignert![]()
Whipping?
![]()
I'd rather have Ikhandas for 6000 years than a special courthouse.
The altar is the best. It's good enough to make entire city sites significantly better, places with lots of food but very little production.
They deserve honorable mention but shaka can build regular courthouses too.
That's the cool part, the combined bonus.
So it's what, Ikhanda -20% maintenance 60no tech requirements and 3 Exp?
Courthouse -50% maintenance 120@ Code of Laws
Total Ikhanda & courthouse -70% maintenance 180and 3 Exp. Zulu
Barracks &Rathaus -75% maintenance 170and 3 Exp HRE
I'll agree that the Rathaus is better in the long run, but in Civ, I always enjoy having my advantages early. That and I'd rather play as Shaka against the HRE than as the HRE against Shaka.
Shaka is aggresive so the Ikhanda is half price. It's why I love the Zulu so much (Impi's are Ok) because they can build up so rapidly. They build core buildings (Granary and Ikhanda) at half price and can build workers to get cities online faster. A very solid civ.
All this talk of the Sacrificial Altar has me thinking, what if you put Darius (or Ragnar) of the Aztec on a water map? Financial allows you to make great use of those water tiles, and the Sacrificial alter makes whipping better! Actually Hannibal may be the best here, as Charismatic makes Monarchy practically unneeded in this strategy since Whipping+Charismatic makes happiness a non-issue.
Shaka is aggresive so the Ikhanda is half price. It's why I love the Zulu so much (Impi's are Ok) because they can build up so rapidly. They build core buildings (Granary and Ikhanda) at half price and can build workers to get cities online faster.
Tell this to Iranon and you'll get a long angry lecture on why you're wrong.