Yeah even Gamespot says it's utter garbage. And they (IGN) gave Civ3 PtW an 8.4 so I guess...
But every website has it's faults, and I hate some of them. Seriously at Gamespot, you get a 9.1 for Wario Ware: Smooth Moves, 9.6 for Castlevania: Circle of the Moon, 8.8 for Zelda: Twilight Princess, 9.3 for Rise of Nations, 8.7 for MGS3: Snake Eater, 8.6 for Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, 8.5 for the original Metal Gear Solid, 8 for Super Mario Sunshine I can't live with some of them. Now, IGN gave WW: SM an 8.2, RoN an 8.2 (should be higher but not over 9/10), 9.5 for Twilight Princess, 9.8 for MGS, 9.6 for MGS3, 9.6 for Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, 9 for Circle of the Moon, 9.4 for Super Mario Sunshine, yeah, most of those are more like it. And Gamespy rated Smash Bros. Brawl worse than MKDS, Civ4, Mario Galaxy, Twilight Princess, etc.
Strategy Informer (or whatever the horsehockey website it's called) gave TP a 7.8 (I'm gonna kill them), while they gave World of Warcraft a 9.3, Half-Life 2 a 9 (same as Mario Galaxy and Civ4), God of War a 9.2, Halo 2 an 8.7, Halo 3 a 9.7 (waaaayyy off), and well, why does WoW beat Civ4, TP, SMG, H2, HL2, GoW, and those things? They're obviously too slated towards multiplayer.